[criteria update] Package set

[Adam Williamson]

On 2012-09-11 5:52, Petr Schindler wrote:

>> > Maybe we should say:
>> > 'The installer must be able to (successfully) install *all
>> > release-blocking desktops* for each supported installation method
>> > (DVD, live, netinst, PXE, ...)'
>>
>> I think that's better, if we assume the new behaviour in anaconda is
>> actually intended.
>
> There is no default 'package set' now (by design, it's not a bug). 
> User
> has to choose something, so we can use the Kamil's version. It seems 
> to
> me reasonable to require installation of release blocking desktops in
> Alpha phase.

I agree. We should also consider whether we want tighter criteria for 
Beta and Final. At some point we should certainly require a minimal 
install to work - I'd say each of the 'desktop' sets, plus the 'minimal' 
option, are the most common use cases, probably.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net