[criteria update] Package set

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 09/11/2012 04:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2012-09-11 5:52, Petr Schindler wrote:
>
>>> > Maybe we should say:
>>> > 'The installer must be able to (successfully) install *all
>>> > release-blocking desktops* for each supported installation method
>>> > (DVD, live, netinst, PXE, ...)'
>>>
>>> I think that's better, if we assume the new behaviour in anaconda is
>>> actually intended.
>>
>> There is no default 'package set' now (by design, it's not a bug). User
>> has to choose something, so we can use the Kamil's version. It seems to
>> me reasonable to require installation of release blocking desktops in
>> Alpha phase.
>
> I agree. We should also consider whether we want tighter criteria for 
> Beta and Final. At some point we should certainly require a minimal 
> install to work - I'd say each of the 'desktop' sets, plus the 
> 'minimal' option, are the most common use cases, probably.
>

It goes without saying we should start with testing minimal up to the 
point it works then whatever is added on top on that hence minimal 
should be an alpha criteria and more or less our first priority...

JBG