Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications

[Adam Williamson]

On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 18:49 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Adam Williamson  wrote:
>         
>         
>         
>         Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release criteria
>         that say
>         "we really stand behind the package sets installed from the
>         DVD" if we
>         don't.
> 
> 
> That is true however the solution is not to weaken the release
> criteria but decide  a) do we need the DVD anymore  b) if we need it,
> whether there is anything against trimming down the default package
> sets to be consistent with what is included in the live images.  With
> the new model, I think the right answer is to drop the DVD image
> entirely but b) is the minimum we should do. 

That requires will on the part of the desktop SIGs, though. QA is not
going to be responsible for this. My position is either the desktop SIGs
fix their stuff, or we will have to change the criteria as I proposed,
because what other choice do we have?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net