Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications

[drago01]

On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 18:49 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Adam Williamson  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>         Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release criteria
>>         that say
>>         "we really stand behind the package sets installed from the
>>         DVD" if we
>>         don't.
>>
>>
>> That is true however the solution is not to weaken the release
>> criteria but decide  a) do we need the DVD anymore  b) if we need it,
>> whether there is anything against trimming down the default package
>> sets to be consistent with what is included in the live images.  With
>> the new model, I think the right answer is to drop the DVD image
>> entirely but b) is the minimum we should do.
>
> That requires will on the part of the desktop SIGs, though. QA is not
> going to be responsible for this. My position is either the desktop SIGs
> fix their stuff, or we will have to change the criteria as I proposed,
> because what other choice do we have?

Talk to FESCo ? Ask for them to remove the offending crap once we hit it?
Or "if the app does not start and is not part of live kick it out".
Its a one line change.