F20 Beta TC1 strange naming

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 3 October 2013 12:23, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 11:20 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3 October 2013 08:47, Gene Czarcinski <gene at czarc.net> wrote:
> >         Shouldn't the Fedora ISOs be named:
> >             Fedora-20-Beta-TC1-x86_64-DVD.iso
> >         rather than:
> >             Fedora-20-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso
> >
> >         I notice that the spin and live ISOs are all named "Beta-TC1"
> >         rather than just "Beta"
> >
> >         Yes, I know, a nit.
> >
> >
> >
> > Not a nit, a misunderstanding. All Test Candidates are prominently
> > named TCn with the version number as 1. Only at the Release candidate
> > stage does the extra letters go away.
>
> No, his point is that that's how it *should* be, but for TC1, doesn't
> appear to be the case - the DVD and netinst images are named as if they
> were RCs.
>


My apologies to everyone. I have clearly failed 4th grade English
comprehension.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20131003/b6080629/attachment.html>