3.16.x on i686

Peter Robinson pbrobinson at gmail.com
Wed Jun 25 09:22:56 UTC 2014


On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 19:48 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 13:52:10 -0500,
>>   Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to> wrote:
>> >On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:34:53 -0700,
>> > Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>All 3.16 kernels before 3.16.0-0.rc2.git0.1 are just fundamentally
>> >>broken on i686, I think, unless you pass 'vdso=0'. I wouldn't bother
>> >>messing with anything unless you're using the rc2 kernel, or passing
>> >>vdso=0.
>> >
>> >I'll be testing that shortly on x86_64 and on i686 tonight. But I am
>> >seeing two different problems and I'd be surprised if either was that
>> >problem. I suspect I am not getting far enough into the boot to see
>> >that problem.
>>
>> 3.16.0-0.rc2.git0.1 is pretty broken too. I am definitely seeing two
>> other issues.
>
> Well, it's a pretty early one, so this isn't surprising. The 'special'
> thing about the vdso bug is it was, AFAICT, more or less a complete
> showstopper for the i686 kernel, regardless of hardware: it happened on
> any system you tried to boot an i686 kernel on.
>
>> >The one affecting raid has been filed. The other one is a crash early
>>
>> It looks like this one might be elsewhere in the I/O stack. When I got
>> a live image to boot, dd reported /dev/sda3 as zero size which would
>> explain why the superblock was bad. blkid returned info about the device
>> so this seems really odd. And it only seems to happen on this one
>> partition.
>
> Yup, file the bugs and hopefully they'll be fixed rapidly :)

We're seeing the same issue with ARM booting, we filed bug 1109603 [1]
but it's some what intermittent.

Peter

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109603


More information about the test mailing list