Test Plan location for 389

[Amita Sharma]

On 05/22/2014 09:22 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2014 20:22:47 +0530
> Amita Sharma <amsharma at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05/17/2014 12:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 12:06 +0530, Amita Sharma wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have created
>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:2014-05-16_Allow_turningoff_vattr_lookup_Test_Plan
>>>> for one of the new feature in 389.
>>>> I want to add it to upstream test plans, but I am not sure where it
>>>> should go exactly,
>>>> 1. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Test_Plans
>>>> 2. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Test_Cases
>>>>
>>>> Please suggest the correct location because I am going to add many
>>>> more.
>>> I'd say it would go in category:test_plans, as it's clearly a test
>>> plan not a test case. Note we do have several existing FreeIPA test
>>> cases - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:FreeIPA_Test_Cases
>>> - though no 389-ds specific ones I know of. I would probably just
>>> name it "QA:Allow_turning_off_vattr_lookup_Test_Plan" - I guess you
>>> copied the inclusion of a date from the 'anaconda usability test
>>> plan', but that was done because that test plan was actually tied
>>> to an event occurring on a specific date, it's probably not
>>> necessary/appropriate for this test plan.
>>>
>>> My personal inclination would be to create individual test case
>>> pages using the test case template for each of the test cases you
>>> currently include as entries in the "How" column of the table - it
>>> might make the table a bit cleaner, and it would also have the
>>> advantage that if we ever do implement a better TCMS, we'd probably
>>> be able to migrate your cases to it automatically (we're vaguely
>>> assuming we'll write some kind of script to hoover up all pages
>>> using the 'test case' template and convert them to whatever TCMS we
>>> eventually, possibly, use).
>>>
>>> Thanks for working on this. I'm curious as to the context: is this
>>> really a Fedora-level effort, or is it more 389-ds upstream-level?
>>> What are the other test plans you are planning to work on? Thanks!
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> I have updated http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Test_Cases with
>> 389 test cases section as you suggested.
>> Created
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_389_Directory_Server and
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_389_Directory_Server
>>
>> My aim is to put some efforts in fedora QA, 389 is my work area so I
>> am starting up with it.
>> Also I want to know if I can organize a test day for 389 with
>> community testers?
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Ami
> Ami,
>
> You can for sure organize a test day! Usually test days happen during a
> branched release like Alpha or Beta - but if it's useful for 389
> development we can schedule one and organize it. I can help you out
> with the organization if you like as well.
>
> // Mike
Thanks Mike,

I would like to pick up a 389 feature in which dev has made changes 
recently like password policy or  automember etc for the test day. Where 
I can setup the test VMs for the test day and Can we have it in second 
week of June sometime?

Regards,
Ami