Should we allow anonymous users to pull from Zanata?
Sean Flanigan
sflaniga at redhat.com
Mon Jul 28 03:37:16 UTC 2014
On 2014-07-25 17:04, Ding Yi Chen wrote:
> At this stage, you need to register to be able to pull.
> In other words, you need to provide zanata APIKEY in order to pull
> or use FAS to login and download translation.
>
> However, if allow anonymous to pull, it will benefit:
> 1. automatic build scripts: so developers can put their build scripts to public git.
> 2. Multilingual dictionary projects: so they can query zanata.
Why can't they use API keys?
> Cons:
> We are not able to track the usage, therefore cannot allocate resource accordingly.
That's a big drawback. We don't want to open the server to denial of
service attacks. Zanata's rate limiting is tied to API keys.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
--
Sean Flanigan
Senior Software Engineer
Engineering - Internationalisation
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 295 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/trans/attachments/20140728/b2d7e260/attachment.sig>
More information about the trans
mailing list