extend EOL for Red Hat Linux 9?
whooperhsd3 at earthlink.net
Mon Apr 5 23:34:27 UTC 2004
James Ralston said:
>> Either a) go with Fedora Legacy or b) convince another third party
>> to support it (like some are doing for 7.3).
> Three words: embargoed security vulnerabilities.
One word: Progeny
Another possibility is KRUD, but I haven't paid close enough attention to
them to see.
> Red Hat has knowledge of what security vulnerabilities have been
> discovered but not yet made public. As a result, Red Hat has time to
> prepare relevant security errata and release them on the same day that
> the vulnerabilities are made public.
I see no reason that members of the Fedora Legacy project couldn't become
members of the same trusted list.
> To my knowledge, no current third-party support mechanism (e.g.,
> Fedora Legacy) have access to embargoed security vulnerabilities.
Fedora Legacy may not currently have access to them, but others do.
> Thus, Red Hat providing extended security errata support for RHL9 is
> superior to any other solution.
Consider the schedule for FC2 has been public for a while and Red Hat
isn't jumping to extend EOL. Besides, people with subscriptions past RHL
9's EOL will have access to RHEL until the end of their subscriptions.
More information about the users