RH now exiting 1 more data center

[Nadeem Bitar]

I think if fedora would be a viable data center OS, the community needs
to start a project similar to the gentoo Server Project. 

http://www.subverted.net/wakka/wakka.php?wakka=MainPage

I am personally very interested in contributing to such project.

nadeem

On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:33 +1000, Res wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Joe Klemmer wrote:
> 
> > > > Slackware.  There's just to much missing from it.  I know it can do the
> > > > job just fine but the maintenance of a Slack box is astronomical
> > > > compared to any of the other distros.  You would probably be better
> > >
> > > actually no, its about the same as RH.
> >
> > 	On what planet?
> 
> On Earth lamer, we've run em both side by side, no more maint has had to
> be given to the slackware boxes than any RH box.
> 
> 
> > 	FC1 is as stable for servers as RH9 ever was.  The only disadvantage to
> > Fedora on REAL servers is it's update cycle.  It will cost a lot more in
> 
> what rubbish, see my original post.
> 
> 
> >
> > 	I'm guessing that you did an upgrade from the 7.3 boxes to FC1.  That's
> 
> No! clean installs on both.
> 
> > 	FC1 is much more reliable and stable than RH8 ever dreamed it could
> who said anything about 8? never used 8 at all.
> 
> > be.  And you must be forgetting about the 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, 6.x days
> > as well.  Fedora is not bullet proof.  Neither was RH9.  If you want
> 
> RH9 is bullet proof on the 3 RH9 boxes remaining.
> 
> 
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
--