Incorect MD5 checksums or what a hell ???
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.org
Wed Jan 5 15:19:24 UTC 2005
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:07:17PM +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
> There's no need. Yes, the md5sums are wrong but RPM packages have
> built-in checksums (and these RPMs also have GPG signatures), which you
> can check using "rpm --checksig *.rpm"
Although, yeah, it's a good point that the checksums in the advisory
*should* match.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
More information about the users
mailing list