Seahorse vs Evolution ?
Karl Larsen
k5di at zianet.com
Tue Dec 18 20:27:34 UTC 2007
Robin Laing wrote:
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
>> On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 13:29 -0500, William Case wrote:
>>> Hi;
>>
>>
>> I really wish more open source developers would think about users who
>> may end up needing to regress before they alter stuff that breaks
>> earlier versions of their app. But that's a side issue.
>>
>
> You also have to look at the changes that RedHat/Fedora make to their
> versions of packages. I have come across these changes over the
> years. Enough to create headaches.
>
> I see this on enough mail lists to know that not all changes are for
> the best.
>
> I do agree that all setup data should be consistent trough iterations
> of software. But there are times that changes are necessary. When
> these times occur, make sure that there are fall back routines.
>
I have been fighting trouble with GPG. It is here on F8 but it
appears to make un-usuable keys. People who have used Seahorse seem to
succeed in making keys that work with the Fedora Doc. It looks like I
must re-do everything with Seahorse. A real pain.
Karl
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
PGP 28AC 2D41 EF25 0417 7166 DD81 44BD ABFC FA8E C752
More information about the users
mailing list