F8 ETA?

[David Boles]

on 10/31/2007 1:05 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
> On Wednesday October 31 2007 11:47:05 am Paul Lemmons wrote:
>> So, the statement of support for *production machines* used in
>> the same breath as *Fedora* is simply a misuse of technology.
> 
> In my view, you're view is nonsense.
> It's your view, for your needs, and that's fine.
> Why do you have a felt need to apply a blanket to the whole 
> community of users based on your perceived needs?
> That's where you lost me.
> 
> There's someone on this list who is running a cluster of 1000 
> Fedora boxes in a production environment, as I recall, for a 
> government agency; why Fedora? As I recall, it had something to 
> do with a specific driver requirement, or something _like_ 
> that... There are others. I run two Fedora servers in a 
> production environment, myself. 
> 
> I could tend to agree with much of what you say until you get so 
> damn categorical - 
> 
> But, what this has to do with the ETA of F8, I'm not sure...you 
> just struck a nerve with that comment above.

If I read it correctly the ETA of F8 is on schedule. Or was this morning.
Whatever they were having a problem with has to be solved by tonight and
they sounded hopeful. Otherwise? + one week.

I think that you are going to like Fedora 8.

-- 

  David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20071031/830e92f3/attachment-0001.bin