Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
Arthur Pemberton
pemboa at gmail.com
Wed Mar 26 06:58:56 UTC 2008
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:48 PM, David G. Mackay <mackay_d at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 18:41 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > > Fedora seems to be getting away from this, but one of the selling points
> > > for Slackware used to be that you could take some of the older hardware
> > > that wouldn't be able to handle the latest Microsoft OS, and still do
> > > useful things with it under Linux.
> >
> > Centos 3.x is still a moderately good choice for this. In fedora terms
> > it would be very, very similar to FC1 (2.4 kernel, etc.) but still
> > getting updates.
>
> I was thinking of updating my firewall/router box to Centos 4.6. Do you
> have any thoughts/warnings on this?
>
>
>
> Dave
Why not Centos 5?
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )
More information about the users
mailing list