Mikkel L. Ellertson mikkel at
Mon Jan 19 16:32:54 UTC 2009

Trey Sizemore wrote:
> On Mon Jan 19, 2009 09:35AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> HP printers seem to be very well supported.  Also I think Brothers
>> printers are as well.  I don't know about Lexmark, but they may be
>> supported good now, or at least better than before.
> I'll second the HP and Brother recommendation.  They have worked great
> for me for a couple of years now.
> I'll continue to buy these brands.
I am running a Brother multi-function laser now, and I am very happy
with it. Brother even has a program to monitor the function keys on
the front of it. About the only thing I am not happy about it the
way you have to "print" to the FAX. You have to put the dialing
information in a file before faxing. Then again, I don't use the
print-to-fax function often anyway.

My only experience with HP is with their older printers, so I can
not comment on current ones. I have used Lexmark, but I was not real
happy with them. (Then again, I do not really like inkjets...)


  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : 

More information about the users mailing list