Reply-To munging summary (was: Bug in mailing lists; unfriendly to non-subscribers)
felipe.contreras at gmail.com
Mon Jul 12 10:57:28 UTC 2010
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras at gmail.com> wrote:
> I haven't seen a summary of this big thread, so I'm going to try to
> write one. I'll focus on Reply-To munging here (orthogonal to
Sorry for replying again on this thread, but I found a few more arguments:
Reply-To munging is against RFC 2822:
When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the mailbox(es) to
which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent.
See the word *author*; the list software is not the author.
So the standard is violated.
More information about the users