Still no kmod for new nvidia

[Steve Searle]

Around 03:33pm on Friday, July 30, 2010 (UK time), David scrawled:

> So that's one example which you 'documented' well. My complaint(s) are
> with the vague claims that some make but then never show any proof.
> Which I am seeing more and more of these days.

Ouch, presumably that is aimed at me for since I made the first
reference to "Driver Hell" in an email I sent this morning (UK time),
however I have had to keep you waiting while I went to work :-)

However so I do not intend to document instances of problems with
Windows drivers on this list.  I have seen them (as well as problems
with drivers on GNU/Linux), and a quick Google reveals one or two.

I suspect that are not that far apart on our thoughts where this relates
to Fedora - I certainly do not think Fedora should be blamed if hardware
is no longer compatible with a new release, or if software provided by a
third party such as RPMFusion stops working. I also feel that if the use
of closed propriety drivers are that critical to someones computer use
then they should be usimg a more stable distro than Fedora.

Steve

-- 
 
 Play Champions - my free football predictions game at:
 	http://www.stevesearle.com/champs/about.html

 15:51:08 up 27 days,  4:02,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100730/9ea0e308/attachment.bin