Regarding Get Fedora page

[g]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
<snip>

> As already pointed out, feedback was requested as part of Fedora Weekly 
> News which was send to fedora-announce list back in Oct.

i missed, or do not recall mention of notice being in 'fwn', but i will
accept you word as to such.

tho 'fwn' is one place to send such notices, i do believe that something
such as new web page for new releases should be sent in their own email
thru announce list.

i do not always fully read 'fwn', tho i do at least read index. so i am at
fault. tho i hope my comments have not appeared as complaining or bitching.


> In addition to all that, if i was a website designer volunteering to do
> something,  I would hesitate to post in this list considering the tone of
> some of the users.

lmao.

no argument their, but as i said, at least bitchers would at least been
given notice if something had been posted and if they did not respond,
they have no one blame but themselves.

-- 

peace out.

tc,hago.

g
.

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 545 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100530/be2542b5/attachment.bin