Fedora vs openSUSE

[g]

On 12/20/2011 05:18 PM, Rameshwar Kr. Sharma wrote:
<>

the fedora vs suse vs ubuntu troll is back. new name. same game.


i tried suse and gave it up. i tried ubuntu and gave it up.

i am red hat/fedora/sl oriented because i do not mind putting out
effort to administer them to keep them running.

fedora is truly not for someone who is oos minded.

suse/ubuntu are for simple oos minded users.


in other words, if you have to keep asking about the two and do not
realize differance yet, go with suse/ubuntu or stay with oos.


if you try to use fedora, you will be posting to this list continuously
trying to get fedora to work.

fedora will take a lot more on your part than oos/suse/ubuntu.



-- 

peace out.

tc.hago,

g
.

*please reply "plain text" only. "html text" are deleted*

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better.
So I installed Linux.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 545 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20111220/db06d29f/attachment.sig>