Wired vs (bad) Wireless communications speeds

[Ric Moore]

On 04/06/2012 07:07 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 06:26, Philip Rhoades<phil at pricom.com.au>  wrote:
>>
>> Anyone know why the wireless performance is not better than this?
>
> Because wireless sucks?.
>
> Your other hardware specs don´t matter. Speed will be as good as the
> worst piece of string. In that setup, it´s your wireless link.
>
> Just to test, connect the two systems with a crossover cat5e cable and
> compare...
>
> I suggest you use Kai Uwe Rommel´s NetIO
> http://www.ars.de/ars/ars.nsf/docs/netio
>
> FC
>
> PS: Really, get your home wired with cat5e or cat6 (best).
> I run gigabit ethernet over cat5e since 2004 and haven´t looked back since.

I have never even tried wireless, but I'm starting to sound like some 
old toothless coot. <cackles> Ric



-- 
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
http://linuxcounter.net/user/44256.html