Yum and Fedora 16 -- focus on "new/moved filesystems"

[Reindl Harald]

Am 09.02.2012 20:50, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 02/09/2012 11:04 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> you know the difference between MOVE and COPY?
>> /usrmove != /usrcopy
> 
> Of course I do.  However, I've learned better than to assume that things like this are named the way you think they
> are.  Just because it's called usrmove doesn't mean that it couldn't have been implemented as a copy, although for
> the life of me, I can't see why.  But then, I've seen large numbers of decisions made recently that make no sense
> to me.

so tame one seocond and imagine how it should work
copy all this files and maintain them twice with yum

sorry, but this makes no sense at all

>> sorry, even if i see no single sense in this adventure but
>> believing the will somehting be copied and after that maintained
>> with the package managment is a little naive even if obe
>> does not know the meaning of the word "move"
> 
> Is there a reason that you feel compelled to add gratuitous insults to as many of your posts as possible?  If so,
> you might spend a moment contemplating the fact that I waste neither time nor bandwith nitpicking your spelling,
> because English is clearly not your first language.

enlish needs not to be me first language to understand how a OS works



-- 

Mit besten Grüßen, Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive design GmbH
A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17
CTO / software-development / cms-solutions
p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33, m: +43 (676) 40 221 40
icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/

http://www.thelounge.net/signature.asc.what.htm

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120209/c6e9a332/attachment.sig>