Cannot find valid baseurl for rpmfusion repo

[n2xssvv.g02gfr12930]

On 06/30/2012 07:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.06.2012 11:20, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
>> On 06/30/2012 09:11 AM, Andre Speelmans wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:51 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
>>> <n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is futile, I'm no longer interested in understanding your position,
>>>> whatever it maybe.
>>> It might on the other hand be worthwhile to see and understand your
>>> own position.
>>> You are the one thinking Reindl has a problem, while in fact he does
>>> not, something he even points out by telling he is not the OP. I am
>>> not meaning you should stop advising, but when doing so, do try to
>>> keep track of who was actually having problems.
>>>
>>> Reindl's question why one would prefer a localrepo, instead of a
>>> localinstall was a quite valid one. Which you do not go into. That I
>>> think exactly like Reindl in this case that this would have no benefit
>>> whatsoever, is what makes me (and probably Reindl too) interested in
>>> the answer to that question. Because if there is a benefit, we would
>>> like to hear it, so we can improve our own knowledge.
>>>
>>> So the question was not about bashing, or whatever, but an interest in
>>> what might be the added value of a local repository versus simple
>>> local packages for a one-shot install.
>>>
>>> So, please, if you see that benefit, enlighten me, as I would really
>>> like to learn it, if there is one.
>>> (And note: we are talking about a one time install on one machine,
>>> nothing needed to distribute among many.)
>>>
>> I refer you to my previous post, but if you wish to waste your time
>> on this, feel free.
>
> what did you not understand in DO NOT POST HTML on mailing-list
> the only one which is wasting time here is you because you
> advise people but you are unable to explain what your method
> should do different than other ones which makes it appearing
> like a blind shot in the dark with no technical reason
>
> you main problem on this thread was beside the tech facts
> taht you still refuse to realize who is the OP with whatever
> problem and who are other epople (like i was in this thread)
>
> a discussion does not work if one of the ivolved people does
> not know to whom he is responding what
>
>
You obviously enjoy wasting your time

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120701/60e7c601/attachment.html>