New 64-bit Fedora Will Not Mount Similar 32-bit Filesystem
Temlakos
temlakos at gmail.com
Sun Nov 4 19:25:26 UTC 2012
On 11/04/2012 02:22 PM, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
> On 11/4/2012 2:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>>> As you can see, lsblk displays information about /dev/sdc, and shows
>>> the mount that I did earlier ("mount /dev/sdc1
>>> /mnt/fedora32"), and shows sdc1 as an ext4 filesystem, but shows
>>> nothing about sdc2 other than that it exists. Any
>>> suggestions?
>>
>> so are you sure that the old setup used LVM at all?
>
> Absolutely. I didn't mention this, but during the last several days
> I've tried a lot of different things to be able to look at the files
> on /dev/sdc, and there were plenty of confirmations of that.
> Furthermore, after the 32-bit installation was done, I often looked at
> the output of fdisk, and it ALWAYS showed LVM information -- pretty
> much the same information as fdisk now shows about the 64-bit
> installation, except for differences in the physical attibutes of the
> hard disks.
>
>> you said "/dev/sdc1" looks like /boot of the old install
>> so i bet /dev/sdc2 is the system-disk and if you did not
>> have a seperated /home what else do you search?
>
> I don't really understand your question. But when I did fdisk on the
> 32-bit system (when it was up and running; it's disassembled now),
> /dev/sdc1 was always listed as /boot. And /dev/sdc2 was always broken
> up into the logical volumes /, swap and /home -- just like the new
> 64-bit installation is.
>
> Alan
>
For what it's worth, I switched from 32-bit F14 to 64-bit F17. I
retained the same LVM and physical-volume setup from before. I kept my
/home partition (actually a logical volume) and reformatted everything
else. I had no problems at all. Of course, I used Anaconda on a KDE Live
Spin to do the up-conversion. But I'm not sure why I should succeed
where the OP failed.
Temlakos
More information about the users
mailing list