"hackers"

[Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.]

n all honesty Mr. Dineen: Absolutely Nothing! But it was fun while it 
lasted, as I'm sure they'll now "shut down" the topic and move on to 
bigger and better things! LoL!


EGO II


On 04/26/2013 01:12 PM, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> Gents:
>
>     I have been quietly listening in to this discussion for several 
> days now!
>
>    I have a simple question: What the hell dose this rant have to do with:
> "Community Support For Fedora Users"??????????
>
> Thomas Dineen
>
>
>
> On 4/25/2013 12:40 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Robert Holtzman <holtzm at cox.net 
>> <mailto:holtzm at cox.net>> wrote:
>>
>>     On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:17:53AM -0700, Richard Vickery wrote:
>>
>>              .........snip.........
>>     >
>>     > Ignore and move on? Would you say the same thing if we, the
>>     state, threw
>>     > you in prison for the use of the term? Civil society already
>>     does. Case in
>>     > point: use of the term "my account has been hacked" or
>>     "...website had been
>>     > hacked" have negative connotations; instead of looking to fix
>>     homes in
>>     > faulty software, they blame someone for attacking them. This
>>     has to change.
>>
>>     No, it doesn't *have to* change and will actively resist.
>>
>>     > People don't normally intend to rob a bank when they go in to
>>     make a
>>     > withdrawal. They have to understand that the same goes for hackers.
>>
>>     No, they don't *have to* understand and will actively resist.
>>
>>     What you're trying to change is human nature.
>>
>>
>> You are just going to let society walk all over you?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130430/59633e45/attachment.html>