Another amusing bug

[g]

On 08/26/2013 10:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
<>

> i referred to wikipedia because *every* article there has references so if
> you are so gently and scroll down or click on the anchors on top you find a
> ton of links referring to Intel websites and PDF's

a virgin, i am not, to wiki*, having been "playing with" and using computers
from s100 days.

i do  not recall when wiki* started, but it was shortly after and i logged
them just to read for pleasure and further education.

it is, as, 'see also', 'references', 'external links'.

as for which, if you have a point to prove, well better you will do, it the
refs/links, you would point.


> i know what FUD is and if you look at the posts of Tom Horsley this is
> *clearly* FUD because he pretends that anything he does not understand is
> related to the NSA without *any* proof

clearly, i read tom's post initial, which from, had i, a good laugh. for some,
it fails, need not "*any* proof", well be, as may, _only _spoof_.

for which, see;

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoof


-- 

peace out.

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

sl6.3 linux

tc.hago.

g
.