Network availability systemd dependency failure at boot

[Sam Varshavchik]

Kevin Fenzi writes:

> On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:30:06 -0400
> Sam Varshavchik <mrsam at courier-mta.com> wrote:
>
> > R. G. Newbury writes:
> >
> > >>
> > >> That at least works up to the day systemd decides
> > >> no one needs rc.local and they drop support for
> > >> it (a day that is sure to come :-).
> > >
> > > Direct support for rc.local has already been "deprecated".
> > > Somewhere I read something from Lennart and it was clear that he
> > > has an almost religious hatred for doing things 'the old way', so
> > > much so that rc.local is not 'desired'.
> >
> > I got the same impression. If it worked, reliably, for decades, it's
> > not desired any more.
>
> I'd love a cite if you can find one... I don't know of any reason it
> would ever be removed. It doesn't run or do anything if you don't have
> an rc.local file.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978849#c6


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140705/157e0426/attachment.sig>