Network availability systemd dependency failure at boot

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Sun Jul 6 00:30:14 UTC 2014


On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 20:17:53 -0400
Sam Varshavchik <mrsam at courier-mta.com> wrote:

> Kevin Fenzi writes:
> 
> > On Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:30:06 -0400
> > Sam Varshavchik <mrsam at courier-mta.com> wrote:
> >
> > > R. G. Newbury writes:
> > >
> > > >>
> > > >> That at least works up to the day systemd decides
> > > >> no one needs rc.local and they drop support for
> > > >> it (a day that is sure to come :-).
> > > >
> > > > Direct support for rc.local has already been "deprecated".
> > > > Somewhere I read something from Lennart and it was clear that he
> > > > has an almost religious hatred for doing things 'the old way',
> > > > so much so that rc.local is not 'desired'.
> > >
> > > I got the same impression. If it worked, reliably, for decades,
> > > it's not desired any more.
> >
> > I'd love a cite if you can find one... I don't know of any reason it
> > would ever be removed. It doesn't run or do anything if you don't
> > have an rc.local file.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978849#c6

Thanks. 

There's no indication there that they intend to ever remove the
compatibility there that I can see. Sure, it's depreciated, but should
be there for compatibility. 

kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140705/e49aee6c/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the users mailing list