why do we use systemd?

[David Benfell]

Glenn Holmer writes:
>
> systemd is broken because you don't like the terms it uses? Really?
> "Target" makes perfect sense: to reach a certain target, enable the
> units in its list.

This kind of argumentation does not help the case for systemd.

'Broken' might be the wrong word. But if the documentation is impenetrable,  
in which case your following snark only adds insult to injury, then yes,  
systemd is unusable.
>
> http://www.lyonlabs.org/just-rtfm.jpg

This is what is known as intellectual bullying. It excuses you from having  
to explain by blaming the other fellow for not understanding.

-- 
David Benfell
See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you do not understand the  
attachment.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140706/5ce6e881/attachment.sig>