why do we use systemd?

[poma]

On 07.07.2014 13:19, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 04:39 +0200, poma wrote:
>> On 06.07.2014 16:45, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 15:32 +0200, poma wrote:
>>>>> I repeat that I am not attacking systemd here, I'm criticizing the
>>>> way
>>>>> it's described. It may seem perfectly clear to those who already
>>>>> understand it, but it's not at all clear to those who are used to
>>>>> something different.
>>>>>
>>>>> poc
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can propose your terminology.
>>>
>>> To do that I would first have to understand it.
>>>
>>> poc
>>>
>>
>> You do not understand your own terminology!? :)
>
> Yeah sure, that's what I meant. Not.
>
> poc
>

You see, you expect systemd to be understandable, however you alone weren't understandable here. :)

Perhaps 'man systemd-what-i-thought' would be helpful to many people here, but those who complain anyway are lazy per se, or they do not care, or are themselves ignorant or are just lame provocateurs etc.

What I do not understand why you are trying to align with that group despite your great experience in the branche.
We should seek advice from you, not vice versa. ;)


poma