No IP 4 address setup no loopback interface

[Ed Greshko]

On 06/24/15 04:59, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 06/23/2015 02:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:44:50 -0600
>> jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 06/21/2015 10:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>>> On 06/22/15 12:31, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>>>> I am still investigating this, but I have an f22 laptop that is
>>>>> only getting an IP6 address set up on the loopback interface. I
>>>>> noticed this because I run a local resolver on 127.0.0.1 and
>>>>> connections to it stopped working over night (after a reboot). The
>>>>> was a NetworkManager update before the reboot where things stopped
>>>>> working, so that seems to be the mostly change that triggered the
>>>>> problem. I'll be able to reboot another f22 machine tomorrow and
>>>>> also should have time to try downgrading NetworkManager to confirm
>>>>> whether or not that update is really causing the problem. (And
>>>>> file a bug and give negative karma if appropriate.)
>>>> FWIW,  also have a laptop running F22 and fully updated.  Currently
>>>> at NetworkManager-1.0.2-1.fc22.x86_64 which I believe is the latest
>>>> and I'm not having any difficulties with my lo interface.
>>>>
>>> Do you also "run a local resolver on 127.0.0.1", as Bruno does?
>> I'm not sure if that was addressed to me, but yes, I use
>> dnssec-tiggerd / unbound here. However, they don't start right on boot
>> due to the missing 127.0.0.1/8. So, I think this is very likely a
>> NetworkManager bug.
>>
>> kevin
>>
> Well, my question for for Ed, since he was not having any issues.
> So, perhaps the difference might have been in the versions of NM
> being used by Ed and yourself?
>
I knew the question was for me.  However, I chose not to respond since the question was irrelevant owing to the differences in the versions of NetworkManager being run as noted in previous message in the thread.

-- 
Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4