No IP 4 address setup no loopback interface

jd1008 jd1008 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 23 21:58:41 UTC 2015



On 06/23/2015 03:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/24/15 04:59, jd1008 wrote:
>>
>> On 06/23/2015 02:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:44:50 -0600
>>> jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06/21/2015 10:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>>>> On 06/22/15 12:31, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>>>>> I am still investigating this, but I have an f22 laptop that is
>>>>>> only getting an IP6 address set up on the loopback interface. I
>>>>>> noticed this because I run a local resolver on 127.0.0.1 and
>>>>>> connections to it stopped working over night (after a reboot). The
>>>>>> was a NetworkManager update before the reboot where things stopped
>>>>>> working, so that seems to be the mostly change that triggered the
>>>>>> problem. I'll be able to reboot another f22 machine tomorrow and
>>>>>> also should have time to try downgrading NetworkManager to confirm
>>>>>> whether or not that update is really causing the problem. (And
>>>>>> file a bug and give negative karma if appropriate.)
>>>>> FWIW,  also have a laptop running F22 and fully updated.  Currently
>>>>> at NetworkManager-1.0.2-1.fc22.x86_64 which I believe is the latest
>>>>> and I'm not having any difficulties with my lo interface.
>>>>>
>>>> Do you also "run a local resolver on 127.0.0.1", as Bruno does?
>>> I'm not sure if that was addressed to me, but yes, I use
>>> dnssec-tiggerd / unbound here. However, they don't start right on boot
>>> due to the missing 127.0.0.1/8. So, I think this is very likely a
>>> NetworkManager bug.
>>>
>>> kevin
>>>
>> Well, my question for for Ed, since he was not having any issues.
>> So, perhaps the difference might have been in the versions of NM
>> being used by Ed and yourself?
>>
> I knew the question was for me.  However, I chose not to respond since the question was irrelevant owing to the differences in the versions of NetworkManager being run as noted in previous message in the thread.
>
I kinda guessed that, but I still wonder if NM is going to work
differently to what people have been used to and could cause
problems in configurations and scripts if the behavioral changes
become engraved in future releases of NM.




More information about the users mailing list