exo 0.10/thunar 1.6.0

Johannes Lips johannes.lips at gmail.com
Thu Dec 6 07:59:19 UTC 2012


On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 22:27:10 +0100
> Martin Sourada <martin.sourada at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:54:32 +0100
> > Christoph Wickert wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
> > > Here is my suggestion:
> > > F17: Probably not.
> > *cough-cough* What about the xfce-4.10 repo?
>
> I will probibly update that...
>
> > > F18: Lets deliver it as a 0-day update, to minimize the change of
> > > the user experience. Otherwise we'll have to support Thunar 1.4
> > > till the F18 EOL and by that time, 1.8 will probably be out already.
> > Seems sane to me to do the 0-day update, definitely better than having
> > to support 1.4 till F18 EOL ourselves.
>
> I don't like the idea. If we are going to push it in, we should do so
> now before final freeze. Waiting and making it a 0 day means we get
> less testing before final to fix anything.
>
> > I'm going to test it myself to see how big the changes in UI are, then
> > I'll be able to give better feedback, but if it's mostly bugfixes and
> > couple of *new* functionality, but not breaking the old behaviour, I
> > would maybe support the idea of having it in F17 as well.
>
> I've not tested it either yet, but I don't think f17 will be viable.
> It's still on 4.8 and exo is depended on by a lot of things.
>
> I do think we should push to f18 asap tho. ;)
>
> kevin
>
Thanks Kevin, just applied the two updates this morning! Finally there are
tabs in Thunar, weird ;-)



>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfce mailing list
> xfce at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/attachments/20121206/71967c55/attachment.html>


More information about the xfce mailing list