humble suggestion to Fedora developers

[Lailah]

El vie, 25-01-2013 a las 22:40 +0100, Frantisek Hanzlik escribió:

> Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 01/25/2013 12:46 PM, James Freer wrote:
> >> LOL - good reply! I must admit i do get fed up with the twin names. In
> >> the Precise version... it was very much IMprecise. Just too many bugs
> >> now to be worth using.
> > 
> > It often seems to me that they're too concerned about making their names
> > cute for my taste, but I don't use it myself and keep my opinion to
> > myself for the most.  Now, alas, it's beginning to look like Fedora's
> > going down that path instead of marketing itself as a serious distro for
> > people who are more interested in how it works than in what it's called.
> >  Alas, from what I can see, unless I'm active as a Fedora dev (My
> > programming skills rusted away decades ago.) the only input I have to the
> > process is making suggestions.  None of us "mere users" have a vote.
> 
> Trend which I see in my Linux "neighbourhood" is quite transparent -
> people switch from Fedora elsewhere: some of them to Centos, others
> to different distro, some leave Linux entirely. Perhaps nobody now
> is using Gnome3. Reasons were always same - unacceptable quantum of
> bugs, which solving take unacceptable quantum of time (when problem
> was possible tackle/bypass by himself). Or there were some SW faults
> which was needed solve with developers, and in many cases it wasn't
> solved even until distro EOL.
> 
> I myself was not afraid install Fedora at production workstations and
> servers, even in their beta phase - but it ended with F12-F13 (F14 was
> still good distro, but in beta phase there was unworkable systemd; in
> final release was upstart). And now I install Fedora not before several
> weeks after final releas - and for testing purposes only.
> 


Well, is curious...   I see the opposite situation.  People from other
distros  (especially Ubuntu)  dropping into Fedora.  May be a geographic
difference?



Regards from the south,
Lailah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130127/b9274a6d/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130127/b9274a6d/attachment-0001.sig>