On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:14:13PM -0400, Thomas Walker wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 01:50:39PM -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Did the above make any significant difference with respect to the performance?
The problem is definitely load related and transient so it is hard to say immediately. I
definitely still see many multisecond bind times, althought they're more of the 3-6
second variety so far (as opposed to teens in the teens like this morning). Since it
comes and goes, I'll need to let it run for awhile to see how things average out.
Can definitely confirm that it has made a substantial difference... Max and average
response times are about 25% of what they were. Still get into high single digit seconds
in some cases, but a significant improvement to be sure.