William,
I'm just a little bit confused about pwadmin concept
vs nsslapd-allow-hashed-passwords. Once I turned on
nsslapd-allow-hashed-passwords, it's no supposed to only users in my
pwadmin(group/users) to be allowed to add pre-hashed password?
Thanks
Alberto Viana
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 7:56 PM William Brown <wbrown(a)suse.de> wrote:
Remember to *unset* it after you make your change, else anyone with
write
to userPassword can bypass your password policy. Generally this means a
userc that is able to change their own password through a self mod, can
then bypass pwpolicy.
> On 7 May 2020, at 01:49, Alberto Viana <albertocrj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> William,
>
> Set nsslapd-allow-hashed-passwords and pwadmin in global policy works as
expected.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Alberto Viana
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 9:22 PM Alberto Viana <albertocrj(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> William,
>
> I will try it tomorrow, but a reference about
"nsslapd-allow-hashed-passwords" in
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11...
make senses to me.
>
>
> Thanks anyway.
>
> Alberto Viana
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 8:58 PM William Brown <wbrown(a)suse.de> wrote:
>
>
> > On 6 May 2020, at 09:09, Alberto Viana <albertocrj(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > William
> >
> > I want to let this user bypass the policy and add a pre-hashed
password,
>
> If you want to add a pre-hashed password here, you'll need to change the
password-migrate flag in cn=config, load that password, then unset the
password migrate flag.
>
>
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/11...
>
>
>
> > I also have a global policy and some OU policies level. On this OU
OU=POP-PA,dc=my,dc=domain I have a local policy set.
> >
> > Should I set pwadmin in local policy level? global policy level is not
enough?
>
> I think the ou policies over-ride the global policy, but regardless,
password hash loading is a seperate issues - as mentioned a pre-hashed PW
bypasses pwpolicy regardless of it's level, and is disallowed unless the
above config value is set. It's not recommended to allow pre-hashed
password upload in production long term, so as mentioned enable it, load
the one password, then disable it.
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Alberto Viana
> >
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 7:57 PM William Brown <wbrown(a)suse.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 6 May 2020, at 04:33, Alberto Viana <albertocrj(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > additional info: invalid password syntax - passwords with storage
scheme are not allowed
> > >
> >
> >
> > This line here is saying that you have a userPassword: {SCHEME}<Hash>
in your ldif (I think). By default we don't allow this, but there is a
migrate password hash option in cn=config.
> >
> > Of course, loading a hash this way bypasses the password policy checks
....
> >
> > So you may want to check your ldif, and set the userPassword as
cleartext for the modify, and the server-side will apply pwpolicy and
perform proper hashing.
> >
> > Hope that helps,
> >
> > —
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > William Brown
> >
> > Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
> > SUSE Labs
> > _______________________________________________
> > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproje...
> > _______________________________________________
> > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproje...
>
> —
> Sincerely,
>
> William Brown
>
> Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
> SUSE Labs
> _______________________________________________
> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproje...
> _______________________________________________
> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproje...
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproje...