sigid@JINLab wrote:
Rich Megginson wrote:
> sigid@JINLab wrote:
>> Rich Megginson wrote:
>>> sigid@JINLab wrote:
>>>> Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>>> sigid@JINLab wrote:
>>>>>> Luke Bigum wrote:
>>>>>>> Sigid, I think Rich means the admin server access log, which
is
>>>>>>> different to the directory server access log. See
>>>>>>> /var/log/dirsrv/admin-serv/access. Tail that, then try
connect
>>>>>>> with Firefox and the admin console. Are you seeing any
>>>>>>> connections?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> my admin access log was empty and tail was show nothing when i
>>>>>> access using firefox or console. But my admin error log shows
>>>>> eek - this is very bad. What platform is this? What version of
>>>>> Fedora DS?
>>>>
>>>> i'm using fedora 8 kernel 2.6.24.7-92 with fedora ds as follows:
>>>> - fedora-ds-base 1.1.1-1
>>>> - fedora-ds 1.1.1-2
>>>> - fedora-ds-admin 1.1.4-1
>>>> - fedora-ds-admin-console 1.1.1-3
>>>> - fedora-ds-console 1.1.1-3
>>> Thanks. 32-bit or 64-bit Fedora 8? Are the above packages 32-bit
>>> or 64-bit e.g.
>>> rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}.%{arch}\n' | grep fedora-ds
>>
>> I'm using 32 bit Fedora 8.
>>
>> -bash-3.2$ rpm -qa --qf '%{name}-%{version}.%{arch}\n' | grep fedora-ds
>> fedora-ds-admin-console-1.1.1.noarch
>> fedora-ds-base-1.1.1.i386
>> fedora-ds-1.1.1.i386
>> fedora-ds-admin-1.1.4.i386
>> fedora-ds-console-1.1.1.noarch
> What about httpd? rpm -qi httpd
>
> Any messages in /var/log/messages? /var/log/secure? Is SELinux
> enabled?
thanks for your support but i have deadline for this server runs for
production. Fortunatelly currently i can use the fedora 9. Refering to
my previous post that fedora 9 was having kernel error on my machine
so it force me to rollback to fedora 8.
On my previous fedora 9 instalation i'm using minimal X by not using
KDE or Gnome. But after i add gnome for my desktop manager, my server
runs well, Alhamdulillah....thanks god...
So right now i'm running fedora 9 instead of fedora 8 on my 3rd
server. My FDS and the java console runs well too. Currently i'm
preparing to upgrade my 1st server PDC (fedora core 5) to reinstalled
with fedora 9. And therefore during reinstalation it need PDC
replacement (3rd server) for production server.
So, Fedora 9 works but not Fedora
8? What could be the difference?
I saw a message last night on IRC - someone attempted to get PHP working
in the Admin Server - was that you? If so, that's probably it. The
Admin Server was not designed to be a general purpose web/app server -
it is a special "instance" of Apache that is designed only to run the
Admin Server and Console apps, and nothing else. Other modules such as
php, python, etc. are not supported and will probably cause bad behavior
up to and including crashing the Admin Server.
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users