Re: [389-users] server crash (389 server 1.2.1 on FC10 domu / centos 5.3 dom0)
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> First ones were the day after a schema modification on
the master
>>> which had not been weel propagated on the slaves.
>>>
>>
>> How did you modify the schema on the master?
>>
>
> Via the console, by adding an attribute.
> Had to copy the schema files to the slaves later.
>
Were there any messages in the errors logs on the supplier or consumers
about not being able to replicate the schema?
Yep, there were some :
[23/Sep/2009:10:59:58 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
agmtlist_add_callback: Can't start agreement "cn=supann0& -
bsupann01,cn=replica,cn="dc=dede, dc=deded, dc=fr",cn=mapping
tree,cn=config"
And many of these :
[23/Sep/2009:14:37:13 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
agmt="cn=bsupann01" (192:389): Replica has a different generation ID
than the local data.
[23/Sep/2009:14:37:17 +0200] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
agmt="cn=bsupann01" (192:389): Replica has a different generation ID
than the local data.
However, I now really want to migrate to some safer virtualisation
environment. Maybe a bit over pessimistic but I'm affraid of the FC11
domU on centos dom0...
Regards,
Mikael