> > I can push the fix (or revert) on Tue afternoon, if you manage to
till then. I'm afraid I'll be unavailable afterwards for 1.5w.
> Stuff should not be removed based on opinions of one person who
nothing to do with the technology in question, nor has any deciding weight
in the project (i.e. is not council/committee.) They can merely bring it up
So my opinion is worthless? Wow. I don't have words for how
is. Despite the apparent worthlessness of my words, I'm still going
the time to reply cordially, because I hope you will learn to see my point
of view on this.
I said that changes to major operating system or official websites related
to it, should not be made based on an opinion of an individual, that the
appropriate body should be the decision maker, not the individual. I said
that the individual (in this case you) should merely take it up for
discussion as you did. Nothing wrong there, in fact, my reply was not
directed at you, nor was it discussing your actions, which were correct,
until this reply of yours. Your reply was not "cordial." Please do not put
words in my mouth as I have neither suggested nor implied that your
opinions are "worthless."
This is not the place to chat about the bugs within OmniSharp but here you
For example, I still don't know what's the holdup for
bringing .NET Core
into Fedora proper.
Did you ask? The answer is simple: Pre-built tools/binaries are used to
build the source. Microsoft does not understand that we need *everything*
to be built from source. It's not easy to teach them how-to-opensource.
But one of the reasons I am part of Fedora is to advance FOSS and
And one of the reasons I desperately feel like running as far away from
Fedora as possible is the "FLOSS-Extremism" and the hate of anything anyhow
related to closed source, Microsoft, etc...
.NET & OpenShift Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: radka | Freenode: Rhea
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Radka Janekova
> > I can push the fix (or revert) on Tue afternoon, if you manage to have
> it till then. I'm afraid I'll be unavailable afterwards for 1.5w.
> Stuff should not be removed based on opinions of one person who has
> nothing to do with the technology in question, nor has any deciding weight
> in the project (i.e. is not council/committee.) They can merely bring it up
> for discussion.
So my opinion is *worthless*? Wow. I don't have words for how awful that
is. Despite the apparent *worthlessness* of my words, I'm still going to
take the time to reply cordially, because I hope you will learn to see my
point of view on this.
> > First, would you please not top-post? It makes it tricky to identify
> what you're responding to.
> First, would you please not tell people what to do, what to write, and
> what to *censor?*
> I top-post when there is nothing to reply, or when I'm replying to
> everything instead of a single sentence. It is my problem how do I reply,
> where I believe that it's very clear and readable. Funny enough I could say
> that you should reply better too, cause your emails are dropping the whole
I'm following the mailing list guidelines
this is an HTML email, though only because I'm replying to an existing HTML
email). I'm replying to relevant parts because mail lists tie emails
together into a thread that can be visible in digests as well as on the web
view of the list in lists.fedoraproject.org.
> > I've been watching the site gradually lose focus on this for a while
> now, and I've been generally displeased about it. However, beyond
> mentioning it a few times on IRC, I've not made too much fuss about it, as
> we've generally been pointing to free and open source solutions so far.
> However, this is the first time I've noticed that we've strayed so far that
> we recommended a non-free solution to potential developers using Fedora.
> > I've become increasingly disappointed with the way things have been
> evolving in Fedora as a whole, but I hoped we wouldn't lose sight of the
> fact that our distribution exists to promote free and open source software
> as well as free culture, and the tools to enable the further development of
> those things.
> > If JetBrains Rider is the only decent tool right now, then the focus
> should be improving the Free tools so they can compete. What the heck has
> happened? I remember the days when Red Hatters stepped up to fill these
> voids when they showed up. We were in a similar situation with Java years
> ago, and Red Hatters and other members of the community stepped up and
> fixed it with the IcedTea project. What makes C# so different that no one
> has stepped up to bat to make a first-class FOSS solution for C# developers?
> > Radka, it's clear you're very passionate about .NET development. But I
> don't know anything about any efforts to make the C# world better
> integrated with the FOSS world, similar to what happened to make Java
> better years ago. If there is something going on, it's really well-hidden.
> So last year of my 12h/day or more of work is not stepping up. Okay.
As I *also* said, I have no idea what is going on in regards to .NET
Core in Fedora. I even do sit in the IRC channel but I don't learn much
from there (there's not much going on there). It's not for a lack of
trying, I just literally don't see any information anywhere about what's
going on. For example, I *still* don't know what's the holdup for
bringing .NET Core into Fedora proper. Last time I checked into it, it was
because LLVM 4.0 wasn't supported, but that seems to no longer be the case?
And we also now have versioned LLVM packages for things that can't keep up
(like .NET Core). So, I don't know why we don't have .NET Core in Fedora
> There are many people in Red Hat spending their free time on Fedora to
> get all the new netcore technologies into Fedora - guess who's working on
That's fantastic! Someone should talk about it! Like maybe on *Fedora
Magazine* or something.
> I would like to highlight something here:
> "Fedora Developer Portal is a place *for open-source developers,*
> providing information about tools, technology and other features that are
> packaged in Fedora."
> - For Developers who write open-source stuff. It does not mean that the
> "tools, technology and other features" have to be open-source.
> Fedora" I read as "stuff that you can very easily use on Fedora."
> a single tarball that works out of the box. Although Eclipse may be
> packaged in Fedora, it's not easy to get it to work with netcore and even
> when you do, you will experience a lot of issues. The best progress we've
> made is teaching Microsoft how to open source and how to licenses, so we
> can actually claim that netcore is open source. VSCode may have open source
> but the binary is using different license for example. AND we're still
> struggling with these issues.
This is a very odd interpretation of that statement. One that I would
hazard to say would be very much out of sync of what most of the Fedora
community believes. "*Packaged in Fedora*" is a very specific statement,
meaning that it is part of the collection of software packages shipped as
RPMs in Fedora, which implies it meets the criteria for inclusion into
Addressing the Visual Studio Code comment: This is not dissimilar to how
Chrome works. The Chrome codebase is open source, but people other than
Google cannot call it Google Chrome, which is why Google prepared the
unbranded "Chromium". I'd hope that Microsoft has a similar
brand" for VS Code or is willing to grant trademark usage along the same
lines that Mozilla has for Firefox to us.
> I should also point out that the order of those things on the page was
> changed a few weeks ago, when we discovered an issue that makes Eclipse and
> VSCode useless, making Rider the only properly working IDE.
What is this issue? Is someone working on it? Any idea when it will be
> I will *not* give in to FLOSS-Extremism and I will *not* censor any
> information from the user. If JetBrains Rider is the best IDE, I will tell
> the whole world about it without any bias, while merely pointing out that
> it's not open source. The developer portal page was well written pointing
> out that fact, while ordering the IDE's by unbiased usefulness score.
> Removing Rider from the developer page is effectively undoing months of my
> work in the bigger picture of the whole fedoraloves.net
What? I'm not telling *you* to shut up about Rider. I'm sure Rider is a
nice IDE. I personally use CLion for some of my C/C++ projects, though
since most of my projects are Python, I use PyCharm quite a bit. But the
focus of Fedora Developer Portal is showing how to use tools *in Fedora*
to do awesome things. And to date, *none* of the JetBrains IDEs (even my
favored PyCharm, which is open source) are available in Fedora. PyCharm is
not mentioned in the Fedora Developer Portal for Python for *exactly* that
reason. Neither is IntelliJ IDEA for Java. Same goes for Android
development using Eclipse or Android Studio, as neither the Android SDK nor
the associated IDE/IDE components are packaged in Fedora.
> Others have my words, the info given, feel free to weight pro's and con's
> of this censorship and decide. I do not want to participate in this thread
> as I am very invested into the topic and my words would not be kind.
>  FLOSS-Extremism is pushing "free" while sacrificing the "friends
> features first" and the mission statement "for developers."
This is literally the first time I've ever heard of this statement. That
said, I care about *all four* pillars of our philosophy equally. If I
wanted to use a charged phrase, I would, but I will simply point out that
the point of Fedora is to push the boundaries for Free and Open Source
Software. Our philosophy comes from that purpose. In my opinion, it is a
disservice to our users if we push one without any of the other, or vice
versa. That doesn't mean we should make life hard for people who choose to
use non-free software. That is their choice. But one of the reasons *I* am
part of Fedora is to advance FOSS and free culture.
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!