4:33 a.m.
Extras repoclosure stripped and pointed to EPEL 5 reports the following
against CentOS 5.1. Included are also EPEL 5 Test Updates and EPEL 5
Needsign:
Summary of broken packages (by owner):
danken AT cs.technion.ac.il
hunspell-he - 1.0-7.el5.i386
dennis AT ausil.us
fedora-packager - 0.1.1-1.el5.noarch
foolish AT guezz.net
perl-libwhisker2 - 2.4-3.el5.noarch
jkeating AT redhat.com
koji-builder - 1.2.3-1.el5.noarch
jlaska AT redhat.com
snake-server - 0.9-0.5git.el5.noarch
jonathansteffan AT gmail.com
revisor-jigdo - 2.0.5-15.el5.noarch
limb AT jcomserv.net
moodle - 1.8.2-1.el5.noarch
lmacken AT redhat.com
bodhi-server - 0.4.4-1.el5.noarch
lxtnow AT gmail.com
python-gammu - 0.20-1.el5.x86_64
matthias AT rpmforge.net
python-Coherence - 0.2.1-3.el5.noarch
mmcgrath AT redhat.com
nagios-devel - 2.9-1.el5.i386
qspencer AT ieee.org
octave-forge - 20071212-6.el5.i386
octave-forge - 20071212-6.el5.x86_64
roozbeh AT farsiweb.info
translate-toolkit - 0.10.1-1.el5.noarch
shahms AT shahms.com
nautilus-bzr - 0.93.0-2.el5.i386
steve AT silug.org
perl-Test-Base - 0.53-1.el5.noarch
tcallawa AT redhat.com
R - 2.6.1-1.el5.i386
R - 2.6.1-1.el5.i386
R - 2.6.1-1.el5.x86_64
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-epel-5-x86_64:
nagios-devel-2.9-1.el5.i386 requires nagios = 0:2.9-1.el5
python-gammu-0.20-1.el5.x86_64 requires libGammu.so.1()(64bit)
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-epel-needsign-5-i386:
R-2.6.1-1.el5.i386 requires perl(File::Copy::Recursive)
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-epel-needsign-5-x86_64:
R-2.6.1-1.el5.i386 requires perl(File::Copy::Recursive)
R-2.6.1-1.el5.x86_64 requires perl(File::Copy::Recursive)
octave-forge-20071212-6.el5.i386 requires libnc-dap.so.3
octave-forge-20071212-6.el5.x86_64 requires libnc-dap.so.3()(64bit)
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-epel-testing-5-i386:
bodhi-server-0.4.4-1.el5.noarch requires yum-utils >= 0:1.1.7
bodhi-server-0.4.4-1.el5.noarch requires mash
fedora-packager-0.1.1-1.el5.noarch requires plague-client
hunspell-he-1.0-7.el5.i386 requires hunspell
koji-builder-1.2.3-1.el5.noarch requires createrepo >= 0:0.4.11
moodle-1.8.2-1.el5.noarch requires mimetex
nautilus-bzr-0.93.0-2.el5.i386 requires nautilus-python >= 0:0.4.3-4
perl-Test-Base-0.53-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Module::Install::Base)
perl-libwhisker2-2.4-3.el5.noarch requires perl(MD5)
python-Coherence-0.2.1-3.el5.noarch requires python-twisted-core
python-Coherence-0.2.1-3.el5.noarch requires python-nevow
python-Coherence-0.2.1-3.el5.noarch requires python-twisted-web
revisor-jigdo-2.0.5-15.el5.noarch requires jigdo
snake-server-0.9-0.5git.el5.noarch requires pykickstart >= 0:1.1
translate-toolkit-0.10.1-1.el5.noarch requires python-enchant
4:57 a.m.
New subject: 2nd try: Broken deps in EPEL 5
Yeah, right, x86_64 test updates were missing (as a result of creating
a yum.conf manually instead of generating it from Config_EPEL.py).
Here's the corrected list:
The old nagios-devel.i386 in x86_64 should be deleted manually by
the EPEL signers.
Summary of broken packages (by owner):
danken AT cs.technion.ac.il
hunspell-he - 1.0-7.el5.i386
hunspell-he - 1.0-7.el5.x86_64
dennis AT ausil.us
fedora-packager - 0.1.1-1.el5.noarch
fedora-packager - 0.1.1-1.el5.noarch
foolish AT guezz.net
perl-libwhisker2 - 2.4-3.el5.noarch
perl-libwhisker2 - 2.4-3.el5.noarch
jkeating AT redhat.com
koji-builder - 1.2.3-1.el5.noarch
koji-builder - 1.2.3-1.el5.noarch
jlaska AT redhat.com
snake-server - 0.9-0.5git.el5.noarch
snake-server - 0.9-0.5git.el5.noarch
jonathansteffan AT gmail.com
revisor-jigdo - 2.0.5-15.el5.noarch
revisor-jigdo - 2.0.5-15.el5.noarch
limb AT jcomserv.net
moodle - 1.8.2-1.el5.noarch
moodle - 1.8.2-1.el5.noarch
lmacken AT redhat.com
bodhi-server - 0.4.4-1.el5.noarch
bodhi-server - 0.4.4-1.el5.noarch
matthias AT rpmforge.net
python-Coherence - 0.2.1-3.el5.noarch
python-Coherence - 0.2.1-3.el5.noarch
mmcgrath AT redhat.com
nagios-devel - 2.9-1.el5.i386
roozbeh AT farsiweb.info
translate-toolkit - 0.10.1-1.el5.noarch
translate-toolkit - 0.10.1-1.el5.noarch
shahms AT shahms.com
nautilus-bzr - 0.93.0-2.el5.i386
nautilus-bzr - 0.93.0-2.el5.x86_64
steve AT silug.org
perl-Test-Base - 0.53-1.el5.noarch
perl-Test-Base - 0.53-1.el5.noarch
tcallawa AT redhat.com
R - 2.6.1-1.el5.i386
R - 2.6.1-1.el5.i386
R - 2.6.1-1.el5.x86_64
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-epel-5-x86_64:
nagios-devel-2.9-1.el5.i386 requires nagios = 0:2.9-1.el5
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-epel-needsign-5-i386:
R-2.6.1-1.el5.i386 requires perl(File::Copy::Recursive)
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-epel-needsign-5-x86_64:
R-2.6.1-1.el5.i386 requires perl(File::Copy::Recursive)
R-2.6.1-1.el5.x86_64 requires perl(File::Copy::Recursive)
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-epel-testing-5-i386:
bodhi-server-0.4.4-1.el5.noarch requires yum-utils >= 0:1.1.7
bodhi-server-0.4.4-1.el5.noarch requires mash
fedora-packager-0.1.1-1.el5.noarch requires plague-client
hunspell-he-1.0-7.el5.i386 requires hunspell
koji-builder-1.2.3-1.el5.noarch requires createrepo >= 0:0.4.11
moodle-1.8.2-1.el5.noarch requires mimetex
nautilus-bzr-0.93.0-2.el5.i386 requires nautilus-python >= 0:0.4.3-4
perl-Test-Base-0.53-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Module::Install::Base)
perl-libwhisker2-2.4-3.el5.noarch requires perl(MD5)
python-Coherence-0.2.1-3.el5.noarch requires python-twisted-core
python-Coherence-0.2.1-3.el5.noarch requires python-nevow
python-Coherence-0.2.1-3.el5.noarch requires python-twisted-web
revisor-jigdo-2.0.5-15.el5.noarch requires jigdo
snake-server-0.9-0.5git.el5.noarch requires pykickstart >= 0:1.1
translate-toolkit-0.10.1-1.el5.noarch requires python-enchant
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-epel-testing-5-x86_64:
bodhi-server-0.4.4-1.el5.noarch requires yum-utils >= 0:1.1.7
bodhi-server-0.4.4-1.el5.noarch requires mash
fedora-packager-0.1.1-1.el5.noarch requires plague-client
hunspell-he-1.0-7.el5.x86_64 requires hunspell
koji-builder-1.2.3-1.el5.noarch requires createrepo >= 0:0.4.11
moodle-1.8.2-1.el5.noarch requires mimetex
nautilus-bzr-0.93.0-2.el5.x86_64 requires nautilus-python >= 0:0.4.3-4
perl-Test-Base-0.53-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Module::Install::Base)
perl-libwhisker2-2.4-3.el5.noarch requires perl(MD5)
python-Coherence-0.2.1-3.el5.noarch requires python-twisted-core
python-Coherence-0.2.1-3.el5.noarch requires python-nevow
python-Coherence-0.2.1-3.el5.noarch requires python-twisted-web
revisor-jigdo-2.0.5-15.el5.noarch requires jigdo
snake-server-0.9-0.5git.el5.noarch requires pykickstart >= 0:1.1
translate-toolkit-0.10.1-1.el5.noarch requires python-enchant
10:06 a.m.
On 13.01.2008 11:33, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Extras repoclosure stripped and pointed to EPEL 5 reports the
following
against CentOS 5.1. Included are also EPEL 5 Test Updates and EPEL 5
Needsign:
Many many thx for your work Michael. It helps a lot.
BTW, if you have some more free cycles and want to to EPEL another
favor: could you shed some light into the dependency checker script EPEL
uses (BTW: does it still run?)? Afaics it's a old one (or not the same
that Extras used?) that doesn't mail the list as the script you used to
generate this report. Would that be hard to implement? Or is it easier
to switch to the script you used?
Summary of broken packages (by owner):
dennis AT ausil.us
fedora-packager - 0.1.1-1.el5.noarch
fedora-packager - 0.1.1-1.el5.noarch
Dgilmore?
foolish AT guezz.net
perl-libwhisker2 - 2.4-3.el5.noarch
perl-libwhisker2 - 2.4-3.el5.noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425827
limb AT jcomserv.net
moodle - 1.8.2-1.el5.noarch
moodle - 1.8.2-1.el5.noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425825
lmacken AT redhat.com
bodhi-server - 0.4.4-1.el5.noarch
bodhi-server - 0.4.4-1.el5.noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417201
matthias AT rpmforge.net
python-Coherence - 0.2.1-3.el5.noarch
python-Coherence - 0.2.1-3.el5.noarch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417221
mmcgrath AT redhat.com
nagios-devel - 2.9-1.el5.i386
Deleted.
danken AT cs.technion.ac.il
hunspell-he - 1.0-7.el5.i386
hunspell-he - 1.0-7.el5.x86_64
Nothing in EPEL afaics requires hunspell; I'd say we remove it for now
until hunspell makes it into EPEL.
jkeating AT redhat.com
koji-builder - 1.2.3-1.el5.noarch
koji-builder - 1.2.3-1.el5.noarch
jlaska AT redhat.com
snake-server - 0.9-0.5git.el5.noarch
snake-server - 0.9-0.5git.el5.noarch
jonathansteffan AT gmail.com
revisor-jigdo - 2.0.5-15.el5.noarch
revisor-jigdo - 2.0.5-15.el5.noarch
roozbeh AT farsiweb.info
translate-toolkit - 0.10.1-1.el5.noarch
translate-toolkit - 0.10.1-1.el5.noarch
shahms AT shahms.com
nautilus-bzr - 0.93.0-2.el5.i386
nautilus-bzr - 0.93.0-2.el5.x86_64
steve AT silug.org
perl-Test-Base - 0.53-1.el5.noarch
perl-Test-Base - 0.53-1.el5.noarch
tcallawa AT redhat.com
R - 2.6.1-1.el5.i386
R - 2.6.1-1.el5.i386
R - 2.6.1-1.el5.x86_64
Might be a good idea to file bugs for those as well. Same for the broken
deps in EPEL4.
Any volunteers?
Cu
knurd
4:05 a.m.
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:06:16 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
BTW, if you have some more free cycles and want to to EPEL another
favor: could you shed some light into the dependency checker script EPEL
uses (BTW: does it still run?)? Afaics it's a old one (or not the same
that Extras used?) that doesn't mail the list as the script you used to
generate this report. Would that be hard to implement? Or is it easier
to switch to the script you used?
I'm not aware of any "dependency checker script EPEL uses".
The one installed on the buildsys machine is the one that Extras used. It
includes the ability to mail the summary and the owners. It doesn't run
for EPEL, because it would need a few patches first. 1) There are no
public RHEL5 binary repos it could use. Hence Config_EPEL.py would need to
be pointed to CentOS 5 repos instead before extras-repoclosure could
generate a yum.conf on-the-fly. 2) CentOS is not available for ppc. Hence
the scripts would need to be patched to exclude ppc. 3) With those two
things fixed, also the optional RCNeedsign.py script could be used to
check tmp installations of the needsign queue, without doing multi-lib
processing however (which is missing, but doable).
Anyway, I plan to publish the modified script I've used to create this
report. It can also mail the owners, but it needs a manually supplied
yum.conf instead of creating one on-the-fly, because it isn't integrated
into the pushscript stuff.
11:57 a.m.
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:05:02 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Anyway, I plan to publish the modified script I've used to create
this
report. It can also mail the owners, but it needs a manually supplied
yum.conf instead of creating one on-the-fly, because it isn't integrated
into the pushscript stuff.
http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/extras-repoclosure-modified-20080115.tgz
Sent bug reports my way. ;)
When running on the buildsys server, there's no need to enter the
FAS account details.
6:43 a.m.
On 15.01.2008 11:05, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:06:16 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> BTW, if you have some more free cycles and want to to EPEL another
> favor: could you shed some light into the dependency checker script EPEL
> uses (BTW: does it still run?)? Afaics it's a old one (or not the same
> that Extras used?) that doesn't mail the list as the script you used to
> generate this report. Would that be hard to implement? Or is it easier
> to switch to the script you used?
I'm not aware of any "dependency checker script EPEL uses".
One was setup somewhere some months ago; dglimore or mmcgrath (CCed)
should know the details.
But I'm not sure if it's still running. And it never mailed the list,
which would be very helpful to know for the EPEL SIG, as we then could
file bugs and/or poke maintainers if problems don't get fixed quickly
(e.g. within one or two weeks) after they show up.
Thus I'm inclined to say: let's switch to your script if that's poissble
without to much work.
Mike?
Cu
knurd
6:28 a.m.
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:57:49 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Anyway, I plan to publish the modified script I've used to
create this
> report. It can also mail the owners, but it needs a manually supplied
> yum.conf instead of creating one on-the-fly, because it isn't integrated
> into the pushscript stuff.
http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/extras-repoclosure-modified-20080115.tgz
Sent bug reports my way. ;)
When running on the buildsys server, there's no need to enter the
FAS account details.
http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/extras-repoclosure-modified-latest.tgz
It now runs on F8 down to EL4. On EL4 it warns if checkForObsolete()
is missing. If run on buildsys.fp.o uncomment the sys.path.insert near
the top.
With regard to the speculation about how long it takes to run, the tarball
includes a yum.conf and an example shell script. You only need to
uncomment one of the examples to try it out. With the default options, it
doesn't send any mails, so don't worry.
11:48 a.m.
On Feb 19, 2008 5:28 AM, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael(a)gmx.net> wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:57:49 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Anyway, I plan to publish the modified script I've used to create this
> > report. It can also mail the owners, but it needs a manually supplied
> > yum.conf instead of creating one on-the-fly, because it isn't integrated
> > into the pushscript stuff.
>
> http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/extras-repoclosure-modified-20080115.tgz
>
> Sent bug reports my way. ;)
>
> When running on the buildsys server, there's no need to enter the
> FAS account details.
http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/extras-repoclosure-modified-latest.tgz
It now runs on F8 down to EL4. On EL4 it warns if checkForObsolete()
is missing. If run on buildsys.fp.o uncomment the sys.path.insert near
the top.
With regard to the speculation about how long it takes to run, the tarball
includes a yum.conf and an example shell script. You only need to
uncomment one of the examples to try it out. With the default options, it
doesn't send any mails, so don't worry.
Cool thanks Micheal.
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
5910
days inactive
5947
days old
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Michael Schwendt -
Stephen John Smoogen -
Thorsten Leemhuis