Epel-packagers-sig June 2024

epel-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
204 discussions

[Bug 2270572] Papirus icon theme (required by budgie-desktop) seems overly large
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Jun '24

01 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270572 --- Comment #18 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> --- Upstream seems unconcerned back in 2021 when this was mentioned to them : https://github.com/PapirusDevelopmentTeam/papirus-icon-theme/issues/2636 SmartFinn: > This is not an easy task, it is not feasible within this repository. If someone wants to moderate a fork under this organization - welcome. varlesh: > @throwaway1037 How you want analize more 7k apps? You have trademark database or want ask all apps-developer about logo, trademark, politics, license and etc? > 7k apps it's only apps/48px, but also we have 16/22/24/32/64 and tray icons 16/22/24... varlesh: > Ok. Complete audit all Papirus files - it's very very very giant work... I don't know how doing this... There are many pitfalls. I don't like idea > > papirus-icon-theme-libre (contains only icons of free software with no trademarks) > Because some free-apps used trademarks, for example Firefox or Fedora > I hink better solution for us - use only system icons without any all 3d-party apps (non-free & free too) varlesh: > Why Papirus popular? Because contained mostly 3-d party apps, because support hardcode-tray, because support folder colors, because present icons with differrent sizes, because use HIG for icons and etc, because i like it? It's unknown. > @throwaway1037 II'm not against if you want create very clean and absolute free Papirus icon theme. But we can't doing this. We can't audit more thousand files. Also our files present as source XML-files, it's not icons formally. > We are ready to solve the problem if it is in our power ---- My graphics designer sister says no one will sue you for having a Facebook or Twitter icon in your theme, it's common practice in any public icon themes for website etc, even well-known open source ones. But from a Fedora/Redhat/IBM point of view this is exposing a legal risk I guess. If I look at Debian for example, the package is orphaned currently, but they still have it in their repos unchanged : https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/papirus-icon-theme Most distros have it too : https://repology.org/project/papirus-icon-theme/packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270572 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2270572] Papirus icon theme (required by budgie-desktop) seems overly large
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 01 Jun '24

01 Jun '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270572 --- Comment #17 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> --- For the legal aspect and the splittings of apps it is gonna be a clusterfsck. There are so many icons, I don't even know to what apps or products they refer to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270572 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 0

[Bug 2281447] New: bear-3.1.4 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 31 May '24

31 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281447 Bug ID: 2281447 Summary: bear-3.1.4 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: bear Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: dan.cermak(a)cgc-instruments.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: code(a)musicinmybrain.net, dan.cermak(a)cgc-instruments.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mgansser(a)netcom-mail.de, thofmann(a)fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 3.1.4 Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.1.4 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.1.3-5.fc40 URL: https://github.com/rizsotto/Bear Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M… Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/18436/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bear -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281447 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 9

[Bug 2242985] New: Please branch and build heaptrack in epel9
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 31 May '24

31 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242985 Bug ID: 2242985 Summary: Please branch and build heaptrack in epel9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Hardware: All OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Component: heaptrack Severity: medium Assignee: jgrulich(a)redhat.com Reporter: cyqsimon(a)163.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jgrulich(a)redhat.com, kde-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora At the moment, heaptrack is packaged in EPEL8 but not EPEL9. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242985 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig June 2024