October 2023 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2245891] New: python-memcached fails to build with Python 3.13: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-memcached-1.59-11.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/python_memcached-1.59-py*.egg-info

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245891 Bug ID: 2245891 Summary: python-memcached fails to build with Python 3.13: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-memcached-1.59-11.fc4 0.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/python_memca ched-1.59-py*.egg-info Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-memcached Assignee: karlthered(a)gmail.com Reporter: ksurma(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: apevec(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, infra-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, karlthered(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)scrye.com, ksurma(a)redhat.com, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, sgallagh(a)redhat.com Blocks: 2244836 (PYTHON3.13) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora python-memcached fails to build with Python 3.13.0a1. This report is automated and not very verbose, but we'll try to get back here with details. RPM build errors: Directory not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-memcached-1.59-11.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/python_memcached-1.59-py*.egg-info Instead, python_memcached-0.0.0-py3.13.egg-info is produced during the build. https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora... For all our attempts to build python-memcached with Python 3.13, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/pytho... Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.13: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.13. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244836 [Bug 2244836] Python 3.13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245891 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 3 weeks

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 2245651] New: python-css-parser fails to build with Python 3.13: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cgi'

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245651 Bug ID: 2245651 Summary: python-css-parser fails to build with Python 3.13: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cgi' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-css-parser Assignee: zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl Reporter: ksurma(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ksurma(a)redhat.com, mhroncok(a)redhat.com, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl Blocks: 2231791 (F40FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS), 2244836 (PYTHON3.13) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora python-css-parser fails to build with Python 3.13.0a1. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/builddir/build/BUILD/css-parser-1.0.7/run_tests.py", line 120, in <module> main() File "/builddir/build/BUILD/css-parser-1.0.7/run_tests.py", line 116, in main run_tests(args.test_name) File "/builddir/build/BUILD/css-parser-1.0.7/run_tests.py", line 77, in run_tests import css_parser File "/builddir/build/BUILD/css-parser-1.0.7/src/css_parser/__init__.py", line 2, in <module> from .profiles import Profiles File "/builddir/build/BUILD/css-parser-1.0.7/src/css_parser/profiles.py", line 2, in <module> from css_parser import util File "/builddir/build/BUILD/css-parser-1.0.7/src/css_parser/util.py", line 33, in <module> from ._fetch import _defaultFetcher File "/builddir/build/BUILD/css-parser-1.0.7/src/css_parser/_fetch.py", line 3, in <module> import css_parser.encutils as encutils File "/builddir/build/BUILD/css-parser-1.0.7/src/css_parser/encutils/__init__.py", line 79, in <module> import cgi ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'cgi' According to https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html module cgi was removed: PEP 594: Remove the cgi and cgitb modules, deprecated in Python 3.11. cgi.FieldStorage can typically be replaced with urllib.parse.parse_qsl() for GET and HEAD requests, and the email.message module or multipart PyPI project for POST and PUT. cgi.parse() can be replaced by calling urllib.parse.parse_qs() directly on the desired query string, except for multipart/form-data input, which can be handled as described for cgi.parse_multipart(). cgi.parse_multipart() can be replaced with the functionality in the email package (e.g. email.message.EmailMessage and email.message.Message) which implements the same MIME RFCs, or with the multipart PyPI project. cgi.parse_header() can be replaced with the functionality in the email package, which implements the same MIME RFCs. For example, with email.message.EmailMessage: from email.message import EmailMessage msg = EmailMessage() msg['content-type'] = 'application/json; charset="utf8"' main, params = msg.get_content_type(), msg['content-type'].params (Contributed by Victor Stinner in gh-104773.) https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.13/fedora... For all our attempts to build python-css-parser with Python 3.13, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/package/pytho... Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.13: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.13/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.13 is planned to be included in Fedora 41. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.13. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231791 [Bug 2231791] Fedora 40 FTBFS Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244836 [Bug 2244836] Python 3.13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245651 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2245226] New: blender-3.6.5 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245226 Bug ID: 2245226 Summary: blender-3.6.5 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: blender Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: code(a)musicinmybrain.net, design-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kwizart(a)gmail.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net, negativo17(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 3.3.12, 3.6.5 Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.6.5 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.6.4-1.fc40 URL: https://www.blender.org/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/201/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245226 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 4 weeks

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2242769] New: Export to dae (open collada) not available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242769 Bug ID: 2242769 Summary: Export to dae (open collada) not available Product: Fedora Version: 38 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: blender Keywords: Desktop Severity: medium Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net Reporter: kjblack(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: code(a)musicinmybrain.net, design-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kwizart(a)gmail.com, luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net, negativo17(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora The most recent version of blender, 1:3.6.4-1.fc38, does not have an option to export to dae format (open collada). The add on for collada is not available in the list of add ons. The option was available in the previous version of blender. This is a big issue for us as we are required to export objects to dae to share with other applications. When I get a copy of blender from the blender website and run it, export to dae is available. The native rpm from fedora does not have it. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. select an object 2. Choose file -> export 3. The option to export to dae is not visible. Actual Results: The option is not available. Expected Results: The option should be present in the menu. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242769 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 4 weeks

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 2097310] CVE-2022-2068 openssl: the c_rehash script allows command injection

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310 errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Red Hat Product Errata | |RHSA-2023:5982 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310

7 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2097310] CVE-2022-2068 openssl: the c_rehash script allows command injection

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310 --- Comment #28 from errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Satellite Client 6 for RHEL 6 Satellite Client 6 for RHEL 7 Satellite Client 6 for RHEL 8 Satellite Client 6 for RHEL 9 Via RHSA-2023:5982 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:5982 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2097310] CVE-2022-2068 openssl: the c_rehash script allows command injection

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310 errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Red Hat Product Errata | |RHSA-2023:5980 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310

7 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2097310] CVE-2022-2068 openssl: the c_rehash script allows command injection

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310 --- Comment #27 from errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Satellite 6.11 for RHEL 7 Red Hat Satellite 6.11 for RHEL 8 Via RHSA-2023:5980 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:5980 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2097310] CVE-2022-2068 openssl: the c_rehash script allows command injection

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310 errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Red Hat Product Errata | |RHSA-2023:5979 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310

7 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2097310] CVE-2022-2068 openssl: the c_rehash script allows command injection

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310 --- Comment #26 from errata-xmlrpc <errata-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> --- This issue has been addressed in the following products: Red Hat Satellite 6.12 for RHEL 8 Via RHSA-2023:5979 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:5979 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

7 months, 4 weeks

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig October 2023