July 2023 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2093731] New: zbarimg does not read a Code 128 barcode

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093731 Bug ID: 2093731 Summary: zbarimg does not read a Code 128 barcode Product: Fedora Version: 36 Status: NEW Component: zbar Severity: high Assignee: gwync(a)protonmail.com Reporter: cristian.ciupitu(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: dougsland(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gwync(a)protonmail.com, mchehab(a)infradead.org, mr.marcelo.barbosa(a)gmail.com, negativo17(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1886898 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1886898&action=edit Code 128 barcode Description of problem: zbarimg does not read a Code 128 barcode Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): zbar-0.23.90-1.fc36.x86_64 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. zbarimg barcode.png Actual results: scanned 0 barcode symbols from 1 images in 0 seconds WARNING: barcode data was not detected in some image(s) Things to check: - is the barcode type supported? Currently supported symbologies are: . EAN/UPC (EAN-13, EAN-8, EAN-2, EAN-5, UPC-A, UPC-E, ISBN-10, ISBN-13) . DataBar, DataBar Expanded . Code 128 . Code 93 . Code 39 . Codabar . Interleaved 2 of 5 . QR code . SQ code . PDF 417 - is the barcode large enough in the image? - is the barcode mostly in focus? - is there sufficient contrast/illumination? - If the symbol is split in several barcodes, are they combined in one image? - Did you enable the barcode type? some EAN/UPC codes are disabled by default. To enable all, use: $ zbarimg -S*.enable <files> Please also notice that some variants take precedence over others. Due to that, if you want, for example, ISBN-10, you should do: $ zbarimg -Sisbn10.enable <files> Expected results: (Code 128) 755897201062022179.73 Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093731

3 days, 14 hours

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 2225757] New: diskimage-builder: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f39

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225757 Bug ID: 2225757 Summary: diskimage-builder: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f39 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: diskimage-builder Assignee: amoralej(a)redhat.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: amoralej(a)redhat.com, apevec(a)redhat.com, bnemec(a)redhat.com, davide(a)cavalca.name, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jslagle(a)redhat.com, mburns(a)redhat.com, openstack-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 2168842 (F39FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora diskimage-builder failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f39 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103568042 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild Please fix diskimage-builder at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, diskimage-builder will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 40, diskimage-builder will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai... Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168842 [Bug 2168842] Fedora 39 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225757 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

6 days, 1 hour

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 2225758] New: dlrn: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f39

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225758 Bug ID: 2225758 Summary: dlrn: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f39 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: dlrn Assignee: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org, jpena(a)redhat.com, openstack-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 2168842 (F39FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora dlrn failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f39 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103568275 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild Please fix dlrn at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, dlrn will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 40, dlrn will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai... Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168842 [Bug 2168842] Fedora 39 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225758 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

6 days, 2 hours

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 2223821] New: TRIAGE-CVE-2023-2975 openssl3: openSSL: AES-SIV cipher implementation contains a bug that causes it to ignore empty associated data entries [epel-8]

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223821 Bug ID: 2223821 Summary: TRIAGE-CVE-2023-2975 openssl3: openSSL: AES-SIV cipher implementation contains a bug that causes it to ignore empty associated data entries [epel-8] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: openssl3 Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: low Priority: low Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: saroy(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223016 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223821 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

1 week, 3 days

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 2211109] New: CVE-2023-2650 openssl3: openssl: Possible DoS translating ASN.1 object identifiers [epel-8]

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211109 Bug ID: 2211109 Summary: CVE-2023-2650 openssl3: openssl: Possible DoS translating ASN.1 object identifiers [epel-8] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: openssl3 Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: saroy(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207947 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211109

1 week, 3 days

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 2188526] New: CVE-2023-1255 openssl3: openssl: Input buffer over-read in AES-XTS implementation on 64 bit ARM [epel-8]

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188526 Bug ID: 2188526 Summary: CVE-2023-1255 openssl3: openssl: Input buffer over-read in AES-XTS implementation on 64 bit ARM [epel-8] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: openssl3 Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: low Priority: low Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: saroy(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188461 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188526

1 week, 3 days

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 2182602] New: CVE-2023-0466 openssl3: openssl: Certificate policy check not enabled [epel-8]

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182602 Bug ID: 2182602 Summary: CVE-2023-0466 openssl3: openssl: Certificate policy check not enabled [epel-8] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: openssl3 Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: low Priority: low Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: trathi(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182602

1 week, 3 days

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 2182590] New: CVE-2023-0465 openssl3: openssl: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored [epel-8]

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182590 Bug ID: 2182590 Summary: CVE-2023-0465 openssl3: openssl: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored [epel-8] Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel8 Status: NEW Component: openssl3 Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: low Priority: low Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: trathi(a)redhat.com CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182561 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182590

1 week, 3 days

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 2219382] New: TRIAGE-CVE-2023-36053 python-django3: python-django: Potential regular expression denial of service vulnerability in EmailValidator/URLValidator [fedora-all]

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219382 Bug ID: 2219382 Summary: TRIAGE-CVE-2023-36053 python-django3: python-django: Potential regular expression denial of service vulnerability in EmailValidator/URLValidator [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 38 Status: NEW Component: python-django3 Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: michel(a)michel-slm.name Reporter: gsuckevi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, michel(a)michel-slm.name Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora More information about this security flaw is available in the following bug: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2218004 Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw indeed affects their package, before starting the update process. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219382 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

3 weeks

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 2215458] New: golang-x-tools-0.10.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215458 Bug ID: 2215458 Summary: golang-x-tools-0.10.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: golang-x-tools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mark.e.fuller(a)gmx.de Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, go-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mark.e.fuller(a)gmx.de Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.10.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.10.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.9.3-1.fc39 URL: https://github.com/golang/tools Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/9382/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-x-tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215458 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

3 weeks, 3 days

1
84
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig July 2023