July 2023 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2211203] New: Please branch and build wx backend for matplotlib in EPEL 9

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211203 Bug ID: 2211203 Summary: Please branch and build wx backend for matplotlib in EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: python-matplotlib Assignee: quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com Reporter: cquike(a)arcor.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, gwync(a)protonmail.com, paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com, tomspur(a)fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: In EPEL 8 the wx backend for matplotlib was provided (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955488). It would be great if this backend is also provided in the EPEL 9 repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211203

11 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2225683] [EPEL9] missing so files when attempting to install GraphicsMagick-devel

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 --- Comment #8 from jeremy.hamilton(a)tekfive.com --- Similarly, this builds correctly in UBI 8. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2226312] New: python-rasterio: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f39

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226312 Bug ID: 2226312 Summary: python-rasterio: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f39 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-rasterio Assignee: quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com Reporter: releng(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, jonathan(a)almalinux.org, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com Blocks: 2168842 (F39FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora python-rasterio failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f39 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103692867 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild Please fix python-rasterio at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, python-rasterio will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 40, python-rasterio will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai... Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168842 [Bug 2168842] Fedora 39 FTBFS Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226312 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2222479] New: Extension fails to run

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222479 Bug ID: 2222479 Summary: Extension fails to run Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator Assignee: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com Reporter: v82a2(a)proton.me QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, hdegoede(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Does not run Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Epel and upstream How reproducible: Most of the time Steps to Reproduce: Install and enable extension Actual results: appindicatorsupport(a)rgcjonas.gmail.com[9423]: While initalizing proxy for org.kde.StatusNotifierItem-10300-1: Error: Argument two may not be null Expected results: No error Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222479 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 2225683] [EPEL9] missing so files when attempting to install GraphicsMagick-devel

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 --- Comment #7 from jeremy.hamilton(a)tekfive.com --- This package is directly related to PHP. And is required to use the pecl gmagick-beta package. This was the whole reason I went down this rabbit hole. But if the ubi image is unable to support PHP properly, then I'll have to start looking elsewhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2225683] [EPEL9] missing so files when attempting to install GraphicsMagick-devel

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) <redhat-one-jira(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Link ID| |Red Hat Issue Tracker | |RHELPLAN-163553 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683

11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2225683] [EPEL9] missing so files when attempting to install GraphicsMagick-devel

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Assignee|jnovy(a)redhat.com |pm-rhel(a)redhat.com Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |smccarty(a)redhat.com Component|ubi9-container |distribution QA Contact|atomic-bugs(a)redhat.com |release-test-team(a)redhat.co | |m Pool ID|sst_container_tools_rhel_9 |sst_program_rhel_9 Last Closed| |2023-07-26 15:17:25 Red Hat Bugzilla <bugzilla(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group| |redhat --- Comment #6 from Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> --- Thank you for reaching out with this request. We appreciate your interest in Red Hat Universal Base Image. Today, UBI is really targeted towards cloud native, application developers working with the following languages: Golang Java .Net Node.js Perl Python Ruby PHP Currently, this request does not fall within the currently approved use cases for inclusion in UBI [1]. The scope of UBI will likely grow and we will keep this use case in mind. Instead we would recommend using a RHEL subscription to get access to these packages, per the UBI FAQ [2]. In particular, take a look at activation keys if this is on a system which cannot easily access subscriptions. [1]: https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/10/09/what-is-red-hat-universal-b... [2]: https://developers.redhat.com/articles/ubi-faq -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2225683] [EPEL9] missing so files when attempting to install GraphicsMagick-devel

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pool ID| |sst_container_tools_rhel_9 Product|Fedora EPEL |Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Assignee|rdieter(a)gmail.com |jnovy(a)redhat.com Component|GraphicsMagick |ubi9-container QA Contact|extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org |atomic-bugs(a)redhat.com Target Milestone|--- |rc Version|epel9 |9.2 CC| |jwboyer(a)redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Troy Dawson <tdawson(a)redhat.com> --- The UBI images only contain a subset of the RHEL content [0]. You can access to RHEL repositories through UBI images in podman by registering the host system with an active subscription using the subscription-manager. $ sudo subscription-manager register I am transferring this ticket to ubi9-container. I do not know if they will be able fix the problem for an unregistered ubi container, but they will get a feeling for what end users want. [0] - https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9/... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2225683] [EPEL9] missing so files when attempting to install GraphicsMagick-devel

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 --- Comment #4 from jeremy.hamilton(a)tekfive.com --- I'm working from the ubi9 base images. Currently working with version 9.2-696. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2225683] [EPEL9] missing so files when attempting to install GraphicsMagick-devel

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 --- Comment #3 from jeremy.hamilton(a)tekfive.com --- dnf list libwmf\* Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:16 ago on Wed Jul 26 13:58:20 2023. Error: No matching Packages to list -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225683 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig July 2023