July 2023 - Epel-packagers-sig - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 2220614] New: F39FailsToInstall: python3-unicorn

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220614 Bug ID: 2220614 Summary: F39FailsToInstall: python3-unicorn Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: unicorn Assignee: redhat(a)flyn.org Reporter: fti-bugs(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch, redhat(a)flyn.org Blocks: 2168845 (F39FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ Your package (unicorn) Fails To Install in Fedora 39: can't install python3-unicorn: - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-unicorn-1.0.3-6.fc38.x86_64 If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-39-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install python3-unicorn P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter... Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168845 [Bug 2168845] Fedora 39 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220614 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

10 months, 1 week

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2220386] New: F39FailsToInstall: python3-oslo-concurrency, python3-oslo-concurrency-tests

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220386 Bug ID: 2220386 Summary: F39FailsToInstall: python3-oslo-concurrency, python3-oslo-concurrency-tests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: python-oslo-concurrency Assignee: mrunge(a)redhat.com Reporter: fti-bugs(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: apevec(a)redhat.com, epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mrunge(a)redhat.com, openstack-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 2168845 (F39FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ Your package (python-oslo-concurrency) Fails To Install in Fedora 39: can't install python3-oslo-concurrency: - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-oslo-concurrency-5.1.1-2.fc39.noarch can't install python3-oslo-concurrency-tests: - nothing provides python(abi) = 3.11 needed by python3-oslo-concurrency-tests-5.1.1-2.fc39.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-39-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install python3-oslo-concurrency python3-oslo-concurrency-tests P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter... Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168845 [Bug 2168845] Fedora 39 Fails To install Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220386 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

10 months, 1 week

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 2159812] New: Can't install blosc-bench on EPEL9

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159812 Bug ID: 2159812 Summary: Can't install blosc-bench on EPEL9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: blosc Assignee: zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl Reporter: dherrera(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, python-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, thibault(a)north.li, zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl Depends On: 2041315 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: blosc-bench doesn't install on EPEL9 because nothing provides python3-matplotlib Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): blosc-bench-1.21.1-3.el9 Steps to Reproduce: 1. sudo dnf -y install blosc-bench Actual results: ... Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides python3-matplotlib needed by blosc-bench-1.21.1-3.el9.x86_64 Additional info: Even if the python-matplotlib package is available in EPEL8, it hasn't been ported to EPEL9 yet. This should get resolved when the proper packaging of python-matplotlib is done. This problem was found using the following service: https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/epel/willit/epel9/status-wont-install.html Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041315 [Bug 2041315] Please branch and build python-matplotlib in epel9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159812

10 months, 1 week

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 2222911] Fedora 38 - Neovim LuaJIT support not activated for s390x

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222911 --- Comment #6 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> --- (In reply to IBM Bug Proxy from comment #5) > ------- Comment From julianruess(a)ibm.com 2023-07-14 12:14 EDT------- > Is it possible to replace the system luajit with luajit2? I hope so, but will leave it on Andreas who is the maintainer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222911 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2222911] Fedora 38 - Neovim LuaJIT support not activated for s390x

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222911 --- Comment #5 from IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy(a)us.ibm.com> --- ------- Comment From julianruess(a)ibm.com 2023-07-14 12:14 EDT------- Is it possible to replace the system luajit with luajit2? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222911 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2214859] New: golang-x-crypto-0.10.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214859 Bug ID: 2214859 Summary: golang-x-crypto-0.10.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: golang-x-crypto Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mark.e.fuller(a)gmx.de Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, go-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mark.e.fuller(a)gmx.de Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.10.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.10.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.9.0-1.fc39 URL: https://github.com/golang/crypto Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/328419/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-x-crypto -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214859 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

10 months, 1 week

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2222911] Fedora 38 - Neovim LuaJIT support not activated for s390x

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222911 --- Comment #4 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> --- As I have said, neovim is built against the distro-provided luajit library. Building against on demand downloaded libraries isn't allowed. Thus we need to fix the system luajit first. Which would be beneficial for other packages as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222911 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2222911] Fedora 38 - Neovim LuaJIT support not activated for s390x

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222911 --- Comment #3 from IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy(a)us.ibm.com> --- ------- Comment From Jan.Polensky(a)ibm.com 2023-07-14 11:15 EDT------- We know that our root problem is LuaJIT atm. But as far as we know the maintainer wants to get paid to support other architectures than the default ones. LuaJIT2 (https://github.com/openresty/luajit2) has a similar maintenance but with s390x support. It is also used by OpenResty. E.g. for neovim, we only need to change the LuaJIT dependency in https://github.com/neovim/neovim/blob/master/cmake.deps/deps.txt to LuaJIT2 and it works on s390x. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222911 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2219003] New: golang-github-alecthomas-chroma-2-2.8.0 is available

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219003 Bug ID: 2219003 Summary: golang-github-alecthomas-chroma-2-2.8.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: golang-github-alecthomas-chroma-2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: redhat(a)flyn.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org CC: epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, go-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, redhat(a)flyn.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 2.8.0 Upstream release that is considered latest: 2.8.0 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.7.0-1.fc39 URL: https://github.com/alecthomas/chroma Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release... Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19344/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-alecthomas-chroma-2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219003 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

10 months, 1 week

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 2222911] Fedora 38 - Neovim LuaJIT support not activated for s390x

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222911 Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467765 (ZedoraTracker) CC| |epel-packagers-sig(a)lists.fe | |doraproject.org, | |oliver(a)redhat.com, | |sipoyare(a)redhat.com Component|neovim |luajit --- Comment #2 from Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> --- I believe we should focus on LuaJIT, rather then a consumer (neovim, it relies on the system luajit package). The current LuaJIT builds are aarch64 + x86 only. Do you say there is a LuaJIT fork that's actively maintained and friendly to non-x86 arches? Because it has been always the root problem ... Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467765 [Bug 467765] Fedora for System z (s390): Bug Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222911 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

Epel-packagers-sig July 2023