https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222969
Bug ID: 2222969 Summary: Installation requires dependent package that cannot be found Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: python-openpyxl Assignee: jujens@jujens.eu Reporter: kiltedknight@verizon.net CC: epel-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org, igor.raits@gmail.com, jonathan@almalinux.org, jujens@jujens.eu Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora
Description of problem: Attempts to install to Rocky Linux 9 from EPEL fail due to an inability to find a dependent package
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.0.10-2.el9.noarch
How reproducible: Configure basic repositories, add EPEL repository, run "dnf install"
Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf install python3-openpyxl
Actual results: $ sudo dnf install python3-openpyxl Last metadata expiration check: 1:59:32 ago on Fri 14 Jul 2023 10:21:04 AM EDT. Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides python3.9dist(et-xmlfile) needed by python3-openpyxl-3.0.10-2.el9.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
Expected results: Package is installed
Additional info: This occurs with both python3-openpyxl and python-openpyxl.
The following is the output of a repolist: repo id repo name appstream Rocky Linux 9 - AppStream baseos Rocky Linux 9 - BaseOS cloudstack Apache CloudStack for Enterprise Linux 9 - x86_64 crb Rocky Linux 9 - CRB epel Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 9 - x86_64 extras Rocky Linux 9 - Extras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222969
--- Comment #1 from Joe Ogulin kiltedknight@verizon.net --- On Rocky 8 it successfully installs and finds the python3-et_xmlfile and python3-jdcal RPMs in EPEL as well. This is leading me to believe the issue is that python3-et_xmlfile needs to be built for EL9.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222969
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4da0d891e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4da0d891e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222969
Julien Enselme jujens@jujens.eu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #3 from Julien Enselme jujens@jujens.eu --- I just submitted python-et_xmlfile to EPEL9: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4da0d891e Let me know whether this solves the issue.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222969
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4da0d891e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4da0d891e
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222969
Julien Enselme jujens@jujens.eu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Julien Enselme jujens@jujens.eu --- python-jdcal is missing. So the package will remain unstinstallable until it's fixed. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224589
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222969
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-e4da0d891e has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222969
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-29fbda999a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-29fbda999a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222969
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-29fbda999a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-29fbda999a
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222969
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed| |2023-09-15 02:00:42
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- FEDORA-EPEL-2023-29fbda999a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
epel-packagers-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com