Hi,
I have just noticed two potential problems in the fonts spec template.
Citing
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate:
Conflicts: fontconfig<xxx
This directive will ensure concurrent fontconfig updating if
your ruleset uses some new syntax fontconfig versions shipped
in previous Fedora releases do not understand.
Do not use a versioned Requires, as this will force fontconfig
installation unconditionally.
Resources like fonts must not force the installation of a
particular handler.
The template's %post and %postun scriptlets run fc-cache from the
fontconfig package.
Potential problem #1: Does "Conflicts: fontconfig<xxx" ensure that the
conflicting fontconfig package is not installed at both %post and
%postun time?
Potential problem #2: What happens if fontconfig is not installed, then
a bunch of font packages are installed, and only then fontconfig is
installed? The font packages' %post have had no chance to run. The
analog problem occurs with %postun when the fontconfig package is
uninstalled.
It's possible that both potential problems turn out not to be problems
at all, but IMHO the docs should address them.
Uli