January 2009 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: wqy-zenhei-fonts AssignedTo: fangqq(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fangqq(a)gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Blocks: 477044 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' '*.ttc' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: — Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font... — our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_... – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template – http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ❄ andika-fonts ❄ apanov-heuristica-fonts ❄ bitstream-vera-fonts ❄ charis-fonts ❄ dejavu-fonts ❄ ecolier-court-fonts ❄ edrip-fonts ❄ gfs-ambrosia-fonts ❄ gfs-artemisia-fonts ❄ gfs-baskerville-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-bodoni-fonts ❄ gfs-complutum-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-classic-fonts ❄ gfs-didot-fonts ❄ gfs-eustace-fonts ❄ gfs-fleischman-fonts ❄ gfs-garaldus-fonts ❄ gfs-gazis-fonts ❄ gfs-jackson-fonts ❄ gfs-neohellenic-fonts ❄ gfs-nicefore-fonts ❄ gfs-olga-fonts ❄ gfs-porson-fonts ❄ gfs-solomos-fonts ❄ gfs-theokritos-fonts ❄ stix-fonts ❄ yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477420] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, rbhalera(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font... - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466852] New: [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466852 Summary: [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: For users coming from SCIM it is confusing not to have a default IME set for their language. ibus should default to an IME for the current locale if available and it should be possible to configure a system default IME per language. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Japanese user starts using ibus and presses Ctrl+Space Actual results: ibus shows bubble asking user to configure Expected results: ibus-anthy to be activated if installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480719] New: [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480719 Summary: [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora It would be nice if the ibus toolbar had the ability to expand to the left instead of the right when the IM is changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466232] New: Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466232 Summary: Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When the last candidate is selected and move to the next one, ibus doesn't go back to the top of candidate. this is a feature regression from scim and also an usability issue. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081006-3.fc10 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.run gedit with LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 say 2.press ctrl+space and type something and space. 3.continue to press space key until move the selection to the end of candidate and press space once again. Actual results: no change of the position to be selected the candidate Expected results: should goes back to the top of the candidate. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font... - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480891] New: [kde session]ibus systray icon 2 icons in desktop and one is not dock in system tray

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kde session]ibus systray icon 2 icons in desktop and one is not dock in system tray https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480891 Summary: [kde session]ibus systray icon 2 icons in desktop and one is not dock in system tray Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: using Fresh kde4 session, I have two ibus icons on my desktop and one ibus icon was out of tray. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081023-3.fc11.i386 How reproducible: Everytime during login Steps to Reproduce: 1. run kde session (fresh if you can by remove ~/.kde/) 2. 3. Actual results: 2 icons are there and only one dock in system tray Expected results: 1) Should it not be only 1 icon per session? Additional info: 1) I have 1 X session running on my mission 2)ps -auxx|grep ibus Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.7/FAQ aalam 3649 0.0 0.6 11200 6628 ? S 11:34 0:00 python /usr/bin/ibus aalam 3708 0.0 0.7 12468 7944 ? S 11:34 0:00 python /usr/share/ibus/daemon/ibusdaemon.py aalam 3711 0.0 0.7 12224 7500 ? S 11:35 0:00 python /usr/share/ibus/gconf/main.py aalam 3712 0.2 2.4 73312 24956 ? S 11:35 0:02 python /usr/share/ibus/ui/gtk/main.py aalam 3713 0.0 0.4 15772 4056 ? S 11:35 0:00 /usr/bin/ibus-x11 --kill-daemon aalam 3739 0.0 0.7 12592 7812 ? S 11:35 0:00 python /usr/share/ibus-m17n/engine/main.py pa:jhelum root 4192 0.0 0.0 4484 716 pts/2 S+ 11:47 0:00 grep ibus 3) kdebase-4.1.96-1.fc11.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466857] New: [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466857 Summary: [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: ibus normally shows it's toolbar all the time, but it can be hidden when off. It should also be possible to turn off (hide) the toolbar completely. (SCIM supports such a feature though it is not commonly used.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466871] New: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466871 Summary: ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: ibus-setup has checkboxes for started and preload but I think this is too complicated for most used and they should just be merged into one option for simplicity since that is generally what one wants. Maybe a start/stop toggle button could be added instead of started if it is useful - that would make the UI much clearer anyway: then selecting an engine should probably start it automatically and users could stop it temporarily if necessary by clicking on toggle state button. Steps to Reproduce: 1. go to engines setup to choose engines Actual results: two sets of confusing checkboxes Expected results: single checkbox per engine Additional info: Being able to start/stop engines dynamically from the setup is a nice feature. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473615] New: ibus-table : Unowned directories

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-table : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473615 Summary: ibus-table : Unowned directories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: ibus-table AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora One or more directories are not included within this package and/or its sub-packages: => ibus-table-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/ibus-table /usr/share/ibus-table/engine /usr/share/ibus-table/tables /usr/share/ibus-table/icons => ibus-table-additional-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/ibus-table /usr/share/ibus-table/tables /usr/share/ibus-table/icons => ibus-table-chinese-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/ibus-table /usr/share/ibus-table/tables /usr/share/ibus-table/icons /usr/share/ibus-table/data Note: It might be necessary to only add them to the main package. [...] Further information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwner... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 4 months

1
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs January 2009