Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617
--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-05-16 05:25:26 EDT ---
This package is currently a bundle of fonts collected from different sources
with different licenses. Our font packaging guidelines would call for some
splitting here (terminus-fonts is an example of mono-bitmap-font package)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Hardcoded requirement for notification-daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500588
Summary: Hardcoded requirement for notification-daemon
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: fedora(a)christoph-wickert.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
I recently imported xfce4-notifyd into F-11 and rawhide, so we have two
alternative implementations of a notification daemon, but this package has a
hardcoded requirement for notification-daemon instead of the virtual package
"desktop-notification-daemon".
Please change the requirement for notification-daemon into
desktop-notification-daemon ASAP, because several builds already failed due to
the conflicting packages being pulled in both.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-0:1.1.0.20090423-1.fc11.i586
Additional info:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-May/msg01062.htmlhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500513https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1788
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |492510
--- Comment #38 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-15 15:12:27 EDT ---
Whoops, wrong bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |notting(a)redhat.com
Blocks|492510 |
--- Comment #37 from Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-15 15:11:46 EDT ---
This font is no longer installed by default, so removing from the blocker list.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497971
Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497971
Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358
--- Comment #3 from XinSun <xinsun(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-15 06:09:44 EDT ---
Actual result:
he result is ৢ and is different from the attachment.
Expected result:
Please see the attachment "Expected result of 09E2.PNG".
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499360
--- Comment #4 from XinSun <xinsun(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-15 05:54:33 EDT ---
Description of problem:
Input "09E3" with "RAW CODE" in gedit, the result has error.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64
pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge.
2.Input "09E3" in gedit.
Actual results:
The result is ৢ and is different from the attachment.
Expected results:
Please see the attachment.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.