Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662604
--- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org 2010-12-20 03:49:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #3)
I updated all "MUST FIX" issues into the spec file; rebuilt the source package and then re-uploaded both onto the same location on FedoraPeople space.
Whenever you make changes to a package, you must increase the release, even durign review. You should also note the changes you did in a changelog entry.
Please review the updates for me. Tell me anything I should do more.
When you give me a -2 package, I will review the remaining points.
(In reply to comment #4)
Btw, do I need to process "N/A" issues?
Not Applicable = the guideline is does not meet this package, so you don't need to care about it here.
(In reply to comment #5)
At this time, we should go ahead with F14, then I will follow up with upstream for the next releases.
I'm sorry, but this is not possible because we need a clean upgrade path. rawhide always needs to have the highest version, otherwise people cannot upgrade from F14 to rawhide. When you do an update or a new package, you first to it in rawhide, then in F14 and then F13.
Maybe you can pick changes from SVN when they are available, but without rawhide I cannot accept the package.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org