Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Improve fontconfig config file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
Summary: Improve fontconfig config file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance@redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: petersen@redhat.com, cchance@redhat.com, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Description of problem: According to the testing result of Bug#578017, it needs to be improved to get things working efficiently for Korean desktop.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): baekmuk-ttf-*-fonts-2.2-25.fc13.noarch
How reproducible: always
Steps to Reproduce: 1.fc-match monospace:lang=ko-kr or sans:lang=ko-kr or serif:lang=ko-kr 2. 3.
Actual results: depends on what kind of fonts are installed.
Expected results: Baekmuk Gulim for monospace, Baekmuk Dotum for sans-serif and Baekmuk Batang for serif should be displayed.
Additional info: See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578017#c4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |586894
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
--- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-05-18 05:41:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=414788) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=414788) proposed fontconfig config file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #414788|proposed fontconfig config |proposed fontconfig config description|file |file for batang.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-05-18 05:43:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=414789) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=414789) proposed fontconfig config file for dotum
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
--- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-05-18 05:43:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=414790) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=414790) proposed fontconfig config file for gulim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-05-18 05:45:52 EDT --- BTW how come 65-baekmuk-ttf-hline.conf is empty? it make no difference to nothing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version| |baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-28.fc | |14
--- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2010-05-26 04:31:28 EDT --- Fixed in baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-28.fc14.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-26 09:44:08 EDT --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-29.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-29.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-26 17:49:40 EDT --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-29.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update baekmuk-ttf-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-29.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-25 14:16:13 EDT --- baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-29.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586306
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-28.fc |baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-29.fc |14 |13 Resolution| |ERRATA
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org